Emerging Perspectives on Sustainability in Business Schools: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Tools in Teaching Sustainability

A. Ar, Yaprak Dalat Ward, E. H. García, A. Abbas
{"title":"Emerging Perspectives on Sustainability in Business Schools: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Tools in Teaching Sustainability","authors":"A. Ar, Yaprak Dalat Ward, E. H. García, A. Abbas","doi":"10.1109/IEEECONF56852.2023.10104976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates and critically assesses the reported pedagogical strategies for teaching sustainability in business schools and looks into Modern Responsible Management Education (MRME) evolving as a central part of business education curricula, mainly supported by digital teaching tools and virtual reality. The study utilizes the ‘‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’’ (PRISMA) framework to answer the following two research questions: (1) What are the state-of-the-art practices in business schools in terms of sustainability? (2) What digital tools are most commonly used to support sustainability-related learning concepts? Data was curated from the Web of Science Core Collection databases from the last five years. The initial search keywords included ‘‘Sustainability’’ + ‘‘Business Education’’ +$\\prime\\prime Technolog \\mathrm{y}$” and yielded 1,477 scholarly works. However, after the PRISMA technique was employed, 286 scholarly sources were identified as eligible for the scope of the study. The findings highlight three main critical points: (1) gamitication techniques can enhance student learning outcomes in sustainability and, in particular, critical thinking; (2) e-platforms and other digital tools can support students’ sustainabilityrelated skills development while emphasizing the importance of sustainability; and (3) e-platforms and virtual pedagogical tools can generate a collaborative and integrated learning environment leading to community-centric mindset. Furthermore, the literature indicated that sustainability-related courses raised awareness of various socio-economic factions and changes in industrial structures toward environmentally friendly organizations and led to betterjob prospects.","PeriodicalId":445092,"journal":{"name":"2023 Future of Educational Innovation-Workshop Series Data in Action","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Future of Educational Innovation-Workshop Series Data in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF56852.2023.10104976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates and critically assesses the reported pedagogical strategies for teaching sustainability in business schools and looks into Modern Responsible Management Education (MRME) evolving as a central part of business education curricula, mainly supported by digital teaching tools and virtual reality. The study utilizes the ‘‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’’ (PRISMA) framework to answer the following two research questions: (1) What are the state-of-the-art practices in business schools in terms of sustainability? (2) What digital tools are most commonly used to support sustainability-related learning concepts? Data was curated from the Web of Science Core Collection databases from the last five years. The initial search keywords included ‘‘Sustainability’’ + ‘‘Business Education’’ +$\prime\prime Technolog \mathrm{y}$” and yielded 1,477 scholarly works. However, after the PRISMA technique was employed, 286 scholarly sources were identified as eligible for the scope of the study. The findings highlight three main critical points: (1) gamitication techniques can enhance student learning outcomes in sustainability and, in particular, critical thinking; (2) e-platforms and other digital tools can support students’ sustainabilityrelated skills development while emphasizing the importance of sustainability; and (3) e-platforms and virtual pedagogical tools can generate a collaborative and integrated learning environment leading to community-centric mindset. Furthermore, the literature indicated that sustainability-related courses raised awareness of various socio-economic factions and changes in industrial structures toward environmentally friendly organizations and led to betterjob prospects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商学院可持续发展的新观点:可持续发展教学工具的系统文献综述
本研究调查并批判性地评估了商学院可持续性教学的教学策略,并研究了现代负责任管理教育(MRME)作为商业教育课程核心部分的演变,主要由数字教学工具和虚拟现实支持。本研究利用“系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目”(PRISMA)框架来回答以下两个研究问题:(1)商学院在可持续性方面的最新实践是什么?(2)最常用于支持与可持续发展相关的学习概念的数字工具是什么?数据是从过去五年的Web of Science Core Collection数据库中整理出来的。最初的搜索关键词包括“可持续发展”+“商业教育”+“$\prime\prime technology \mathrm{y}$”,得到1477篇学术论文。然而,在采用PRISMA技术后,286个学术来源被确定为符合研究范围的。研究结果强调了三个关键点:(1)游戏化技术可以提高学生在可持续性方面的学习成果,尤其是批判性思维;(2)电子平台和其他数字工具可以在强调可持续性重要性的同时支持学生的可持续发展相关技能发展;(3)电子平台和虚拟教学工具可以产生协作和整合的学习环境,从而形成以社区为中心的思维模式。此外,文献表明,与可持续性有关的课程提高了各种社会经济派别和工业结构向环境友好组织的变化的认识,并导致更好的就业前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Perspectives on Sustainability in Business Schools: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Tools in Teaching Sustainability Applications of Natural Language Processing for Industry 4.0 Skills Development Tailor-Made Nutrition Education for University Students through Data Science Instructional Usability and Learner-User eXperience Assessment in a Virtual Reality Educational Milieu: A Deductive Tech-Instructionality Model from EdTech Experimental Survey’s results for IoT Projects with Tinkercad Circuits Prototypes for Virtual Classes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1