{"title":"Effect of Blended Learning on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Herman Lusa, A. Adnan, Yurniwati Yurniwati","doi":"10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Effect of Blended Learning on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Objective: This research aims to determine the effect of blended learning implementation in Indonesia between 2016-2020. Methods: This is a meta-analysis study and 27 articles met the criteria analyzed by Revman 5.4. This study reported effect size of blended learning on learning outcomes consisting of subgroups of education levels (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, vocational education, and college) and subgroups of learning outcomes (knowledge, thinking ability, and attitude). Findings: The theoretical effect size score of Standard Mean Difference or SMD = 1.01 (95% CI [0.802– 1.20). P < 0.00001) for blended learning compared to conventional. Subgroup analysis obtained a high category effect size for Blended Learning’s application according to the level of education and learning achievement. Except for the effect size for attitudes belongs to the moderate category. Conclusion: This study concluded that Blended Learning positively affects knowledge mastery, thinking ability, motivation, and learning independence at all levels of education. Keywords: blended learning, learning outcomes, education level. Abstrak: Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa: Suatu Meta Analisis. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan blended learning di Indonesia antara tahun 2016–2020. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian meta-analisis dan 27 artikel telah memenuhi kriteria setelah dianalisis dengan menggunakan Revman 5.4. Dalam penelitian ini dilaporkan effect size dari blended learning terhadap hasil belajar yang terdiri atas subgroup jenjang pendidikan (SD, SMP, SMA, SMK dan Perguruan tinggi) dan subgroup hasil belajar (pengetahuan, kemampuan berpikir, dan sikap). Temuan: Skor effect size teoritik standar mean difference atau SMD = 1.01 (95% CI [0.802– 1.20). P < 0.00001) untuk blended learning dibandingkan dengan metode pembelajaran konvensional. Analisis subgrup diperoleh informasi bahwa effect size berkategori tinggi untuk penerapan blended learning sesuai jenjang pendidikan dan hasil belajar. Kecuali effect size untuk sikap masuk ke dalam kategori sedang. Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Blended Learning memberi pengaruh positif terhadap penguasaan pengetahuah. kemampuan berpikir. motivasi dan kemandirian belajar di semua jenjang pendidikan. Kata kunci: blended learning, hasil belajar, tingkat pendidikan. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113","PeriodicalId":187704,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Abstract: Effect of Blended Learning on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Objective: This research aims to determine the effect of blended learning implementation in Indonesia between 2016-2020. Methods: This is a meta-analysis study and 27 articles met the criteria analyzed by Revman 5.4. This study reported effect size of blended learning on learning outcomes consisting of subgroups of education levels (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, vocational education, and college) and subgroups of learning outcomes (knowledge, thinking ability, and attitude). Findings: The theoretical effect size score of Standard Mean Difference or SMD = 1.01 (95% CI [0.802– 1.20). P < 0.00001) for blended learning compared to conventional. Subgroup analysis obtained a high category effect size for Blended Learning’s application according to the level of education and learning achievement. Except for the effect size for attitudes belongs to the moderate category. Conclusion: This study concluded that Blended Learning positively affects knowledge mastery, thinking ability, motivation, and learning independence at all levels of education. Keywords: blended learning, learning outcomes, education level. Abstrak: Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa: Suatu Meta Analisis. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan blended learning di Indonesia antara tahun 2016–2020. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian meta-analisis dan 27 artikel telah memenuhi kriteria setelah dianalisis dengan menggunakan Revman 5.4. Dalam penelitian ini dilaporkan effect size dari blended learning terhadap hasil belajar yang terdiri atas subgroup jenjang pendidikan (SD, SMP, SMA, SMK dan Perguruan tinggi) dan subgroup hasil belajar (pengetahuan, kemampuan berpikir, dan sikap). Temuan: Skor effect size teoritik standar mean difference atau SMD = 1.01 (95% CI [0.802– 1.20). P < 0.00001) untuk blended learning dibandingkan dengan metode pembelajaran konvensional. Analisis subgrup diperoleh informasi bahwa effect size berkategori tinggi untuk penerapan blended learning sesuai jenjang pendidikan dan hasil belajar. Kecuali effect size untuk sikap masuk ke dalam kategori sedang. Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Blended Learning memberi pengaruh positif terhadap penguasaan pengetahuah. kemampuan berpikir. motivasi dan kemandirian belajar di semua jenjang pendidikan. Kata kunci: blended learning, hasil belajar, tingkat pendidikan. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113
摘要:混合式学习对学生学习成果的影响:meta分析。目的:本研究旨在确定2016-2020年在印度尼西亚实施混合学习的效果。方法:这是一项荟萃分析研究,27篇文章符合Revman 5.4的标准。本研究报告了混合学习对学习成果的效应量,包括教育水平亚组(小学、初中、高中、职业教育和大学)和学习成果亚组(知识、思维能力和态度)。结果:标准均差或SMD的理论效应大小得分= 1.01 (95% CI[0.802 - 1.20])。P < 0.00001)。亚组分析显示,根据受教育程度和学习成就,混合式学习的应用具有较高的类别效应量。除了态度的效应大小属于中等类别。结论:本研究得出混合学习对各级教育学生的知识掌握、思维能力、学习动机和学习独立性有积极影响。关键词:混合式学习,学习成果,教育水平。[摘要]Pengaruh混合式学习模型Hasil Belajar Siswa: Suatu Meta分析。图胡安:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan混合学习di Indonesia antara tahun 2016-2020。方法:Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian meta- analysis,共27篇文章。Dalam penelitian ini的效果大小达达混合式学习的hahail belajar yang terdiri的亚组jenjang pendidikan (SD, SMP, SMA, SMK, dan Perguruan tinggi)丹亚组hasil belajar (pengetahuan, kemampuan berpikir, dan sikap)。Temuan: Skor效应大小与标准均差(SMD) = 1.01 (95% CI[0.802 - 1.20)。P < 0.00001),表明混合式学习方法与传统的学习方法具有显著性差异。分析子组的混合学习信息和效应大小,研究了混合学习在日本的应用。Kecuali效应的大小。kespulpan: Penelitian ini menypulpkan bahwa混合学习成员,pengaruh positive, hadap penguasaan and pengetahuah。kemampuan berpikir。这是我的梦想,我的梦想,我的梦想。Kata kunci:混合学习,hasil belajar, tingkat pendidikan。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113