{"title":"Asthmavorhersage bei älteren Patienten auf Basis klinischer Anamnese","authors":"H. Frohnhofen","doi":"10.1159/000495532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diagnosis of asthma is not always straightforward and can be even more challenging in older adults. Asthma is ideally confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory airflow limitation. However, many patients with asthma do not demonstrate airflow obstruction nor show bronchodilator reversibility. We aimed to investigate predictors for a positive bronchial challenge test with methacholine in older adults being evaluated for asthma. Methods: This is a diagnostic accuracy study with a cross-sectional design. Participants ≥60 years with suspected asthma and a negative postbronchodilator response on spirometry were included. All participants underwent a methacholine challenge test (MCT). We assessed the value of standard asthma screening questions and additional clinical questions to predict the MCT results. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to assess the variables independently impacting the odds of a positive MCT result. Results: Our study included 71 participants. The majority were female (n = 52, 73.2%) and the average age was 67.0 years. Those with a positive MCT (n = 55, 77.5%) were more likely to have wheezing or coughing due to allergens (n = 51, 92.7% vs. n = 12, 75.0%; P = 0.004) and difficulty walking several blocks (n = 14, 25.5% vs. n = 1, 6.3%, P = 0.009). After adjustment, having wheezing or coughing due to allergens (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-7.8, P = 0.012) remained the only significant independent predictor of a positive MCT. Conclusions: In older adults with suspected asthma, questioning about wheezing or coughing due to allergens provides a modest independent value to predict a MCT result in those who previously had a negative postbronchodilator response on spirometry.","PeriodicalId":306175,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000495532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of asthma is not always straightforward and can be even more challenging in older adults. Asthma is ideally confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory airflow limitation. However, many patients with asthma do not demonstrate airflow obstruction nor show bronchodilator reversibility. We aimed to investigate predictors for a positive bronchial challenge test with methacholine in older adults being evaluated for asthma. Methods: This is a diagnostic accuracy study with a cross-sectional design. Participants ≥60 years with suspected asthma and a negative postbronchodilator response on spirometry were included. All participants underwent a methacholine challenge test (MCT). We assessed the value of standard asthma screening questions and additional clinical questions to predict the MCT results. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to assess the variables independently impacting the odds of a positive MCT result. Results: Our study included 71 participants. The majority were female (n = 52, 73.2%) and the average age was 67.0 years. Those with a positive MCT (n = 55, 77.5%) were more likely to have wheezing or coughing due to allergens (n = 51, 92.7% vs. n = 12, 75.0%; P = 0.004) and difficulty walking several blocks (n = 14, 25.5% vs. n = 1, 6.3%, P = 0.009). After adjustment, having wheezing or coughing due to allergens (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-7.8, P = 0.012) remained the only significant independent predictor of a positive MCT. Conclusions: In older adults with suspected asthma, questioning about wheezing or coughing due to allergens provides a modest independent value to predict a MCT result in those who previously had a negative postbronchodilator response on spirometry.
背景:哮喘的诊断并不总是直截了当的,在老年人中可能更具挑战性。理想情况下,哮喘可以通过呼气气流受限的变化来确诊。然而,许多哮喘患者并未表现出气流阻塞或支气管扩张剂可逆性。我们的目的是研究评估哮喘的老年人用甲胆碱支气管激发试验阳性的预测因素。方法:采用横断面设计进行诊断准确性研究。受试者年龄≥60岁,疑似哮喘,肺活量测定支气管扩张剂后反应阴性。所有参与者都进行了甲胆碱激发试验(MCT)。我们评估了标准哮喘筛查问题和附加临床问题预测MCT结果的价值。建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型来评估独立影响MCT阳性结果几率的变量。结果:本研究纳入71名受试者。以女性居多(n = 52,73.2%),平均年龄67.0岁。MCT阳性的患者(n = 55,77.5%)更容易因过敏原引起喘息或咳嗽(n = 51,92.7% vs. n = 12,75.0%;P = 0.004)和步行几个街区的困难(n = 14,25.5% vs. n = 1,6.3%,P = 0.009)。调整后,因过敏原引起的喘息或咳嗽(or = 4.2,95% CI 1.7-7.8, P = 0.012)仍然是MCT阳性的唯一显著独立预测因子。结论:在疑似哮喘的老年人中,询问因过敏原引起的喘息或咳嗽,对于预测先前在肺量测定中支气管扩张剂后反应为阴性的MCT结果提供了适度的独立价值。