'A matter to none but the men of the Island of Britain'. Historical revisionism and the assertion of Brittonic primacy in Breudwyt Maxen Wledic

Joseph Shack
{"title":"'A matter to none but the men of the Island of Britain'. Historical revisionism and the assertion of Brittonic primacy in Breudwyt Maxen Wledic","authors":"Joseph Shack","doi":"10.1353/cel.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The short Middle Welsh prose tale Breudwyt Maxen Wledic is a work brimming with historiographical significance. Much of this interest revolves around the tale's title character Maxen, a figure based upon the late antique Roman tyrant Magnus Maximus, who was raised to imperium by his soldiers in Britain before pursuing power on the continent. Maximus appears in genealogical tracts as a means of imbuing native dynasts with an imperial heritage, and Breudwyt Maxen is generally understood as an extension of that foundational impulse. In contrast, the aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the composer of the tale intentionally rendered a negative characterization of Maxen, minimizing his accomplishments and his efficacy as a leader, while simultaneously inflating the roles of the Brittonic characters in the text. In doing so, the tale recontextualizes the Roman past of contemporary Wales, attributing tangible remains of Roman military occupation embedded in the landscape instead to Brittonic prowess and ingenuity. Such ideological work may represent a desire on the part of the compiler to respond to trends in twelfth- and thirteenth-century English historiography, particularly Geoffrey of Monmouth, whose De gestis Britonum recounts a version of the Maxen tale as part of a larger narrative of Brittonic decline and sovereignty loss. Breudwyt Maxen, then, may be read as an effective rejoinder to narratives of Brittonic abasement.","PeriodicalId":160851,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of Celtic studies","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of Celtic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cel.2023.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The short Middle Welsh prose tale Breudwyt Maxen Wledic is a work brimming with historiographical significance. Much of this interest revolves around the tale's title character Maxen, a figure based upon the late antique Roman tyrant Magnus Maximus, who was raised to imperium by his soldiers in Britain before pursuing power on the continent. Maximus appears in genealogical tracts as a means of imbuing native dynasts with an imperial heritage, and Breudwyt Maxen is generally understood as an extension of that foundational impulse. In contrast, the aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the composer of the tale intentionally rendered a negative characterization of Maxen, minimizing his accomplishments and his efficacy as a leader, while simultaneously inflating the roles of the Brittonic characters in the text. In doing so, the tale recontextualizes the Roman past of contemporary Wales, attributing tangible remains of Roman military occupation embedded in the landscape instead to Brittonic prowess and ingenuity. Such ideological work may represent a desire on the part of the compiler to respond to trends in twelfth- and thirteenth-century English historiography, particularly Geoffrey of Monmouth, whose De gestis Britonum recounts a version of the Maxen tale as part of a larger narrative of Brittonic decline and sovereignty loss. Breudwyt Maxen, then, may be read as an effective rejoinder to narratives of Brittonic abasement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这事只有不列颠岛上的人才知道"历史修正主义与《布吕德怀特·马克森·韦德奇》中不列颠至上主义的主张
中世纪威尔士散文短篇小说《布吕德怀特·马克森·韦莱迪奇》是一部极具史学意义的作品。故事的主角马克森(Maxen)吸引了很多人的兴趣,他的原型是古罗马晚期的暴君马格努斯·马克西姆斯(Magnus Maximus),在进军欧洲大陆之前,他在英国被士兵们提拔为皇帝。马克西姆斯出现在宗谱中,是一种向本土王朝灌输帝国遗产的手段,而布吕德怀特·马克森通常被理解为这种基本冲动的延伸。相比之下,本文的目的是证明故事的作者故意对马克森进行了负面的描述,最小化了他的成就和他作为领导者的效力,同时夸大了布里顿人物在文本中的作用。在这样做的过程中,这个故事将当代威尔士的罗马历史重新置于背景下,将罗马军事占领的有形遗迹嵌入景观中,而不是将其归因于不列颠人的实力和聪明才智。这样的意识形态作品可能代表了编纂者对12世纪和13世纪英国史学趋势的回应,尤其是蒙茅斯的杰弗里,他的《英国史》(De gestis Britonum)讲述了马克森故事的一个版本,作为不列颠衰落和主权丧失的更大叙事的一部分。因此,《布吕德怀特·马克森》可以被解读为对不列颠屈辱叙事的有效反驳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Memestra eget. Non-standard use of prepositions from second-language learners in Modern Breton 'A matter to none but the men of the Island of Britain'. Historical revisionism and the assertion of Brittonic primacy in Breudwyt Maxen Wledic History and identity in early medieval Wales by Rebecca Thomas (review) The kings of Aileach and the Vikings, ad 800–1060 by Darren McGettigan (review) The origin legends of early medieval Britain and Ireland by Lindy Brady (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1