Evaluation of the Impact on Fauna Caused by the Presence of Ecotourists on Trails of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, Amazonas, Brazil

A. Storni, Paulo M. Veras De Paiva, Ricardo Bernal And, N. Peralta
{"title":"Evaluation of the Impact on Fauna Caused by the Presence of Ecotourists on Trails of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, Amazonas, Brazil","authors":"A. Storni, Paulo M. Veras De Paiva, Ricardo Bernal And, N. Peralta","doi":"10.1080/14790530701275688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ecotourism has been defended as a viable option for the maintenance of protected areas in the Amazon. The present study was carried out in a community-based ecotourism project. The project had been implemented eight years ago in a protected area in Brazil. The main objective of the present study was to monitor the environmental impacts of ecotourism on the fauna of Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, in order to implement measures that aim to minimize those impacts. Eight animal species were monitored. Five primates: Cacajao calvus (white bold uakari), Saimiri vanzolinii (black-faced squirrel monkey), Saimiri sciureus (common squirrel monkey), Alouatta seniculus (red howler monkey), Cebus macrocephalus (brown capuchin monkey); and three birds: Monasa nigrifrons (black-fronted nunbird), Crax globulosa (wattled curassow) and Mitu tuberosum (great curassow) from 2002 to 2005. These animals were chosen for their biological importance for the area and because, as we were informed by local guides, they are common on Mamirauá trails. For the primates, the white bold uakari and black-faced squirrel monkey are considered endangered and vulnerable, respectively. For the birds, the wattled curassow is considered vulnerable (Base de Dados Tropical, 2006). Results found in the present study suggest there was no statistically significant difference between the observations of animals on trails with and without tourists for most of the species studied. Only one primate species (black-faced squirrel monkey) and one bird species (black-fronted nunbird) presented statistically significant differences in analyses with and without tourists (t-test: t = −2.27; p = 0.0267 and Mann-Whitney U = 207.5; p = 0.0025, respectively).","PeriodicalId":130558,"journal":{"name":"Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14790530701275688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Abstract Ecotourism has been defended as a viable option for the maintenance of protected areas in the Amazon. The present study was carried out in a community-based ecotourism project. The project had been implemented eight years ago in a protected area in Brazil. The main objective of the present study was to monitor the environmental impacts of ecotourism on the fauna of Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, in order to implement measures that aim to minimize those impacts. Eight animal species were monitored. Five primates: Cacajao calvus (white bold uakari), Saimiri vanzolinii (black-faced squirrel monkey), Saimiri sciureus (common squirrel monkey), Alouatta seniculus (red howler monkey), Cebus macrocephalus (brown capuchin monkey); and three birds: Monasa nigrifrons (black-fronted nunbird), Crax globulosa (wattled curassow) and Mitu tuberosum (great curassow) from 2002 to 2005. These animals were chosen for their biological importance for the area and because, as we were informed by local guides, they are common on Mamirauá trails. For the primates, the white bold uakari and black-faced squirrel monkey are considered endangered and vulnerable, respectively. For the birds, the wattled curassow is considered vulnerable (Base de Dados Tropical, 2006). Results found in the present study suggest there was no statistically significant difference between the observations of animals on trails with and without tourists for most of the species studied. Only one primate species (black-faced squirrel monkey) and one bird species (black-fronted nunbird) presented statistically significant differences in analyses with and without tourists (t-test: t = −2.27; p = 0.0267 and Mann-Whitney U = 207.5; p = 0.0025, respectively).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西亚马孙mamirau可持续发展保护区步道生态游客对动物的影响评价
生态旅游一直被认为是维护亚马逊保护区的可行选择。本研究是在一个社区生态旅游项目中进行的。该项目于八年前在巴西的一个保护区实施。本研究的主要目的是监测生态旅游对mamirau可持续发展保护区动物群的环境影响,以便采取措施尽量减少这些影响。对8种动物进行了监测。五种灵长类动物:Cacajao calvus(白色粗体松鼠猴)、Saimiri vanzolinii(黑脸松鼠猴)、Saimiri sciureus(普通松鼠猴)、Alouatta seniculus(红色咆哮猴)、Cebus macrocephalus(棕色卷尾猴);和三只鸟:Monasa nigrifrons (black-fronted nunbird), Crax globulosa(编成的大鸟)和Mitu tuberosum(伟大的大鸟)从2002年到2005年。选择这些动物是因为它们对该地区的生物重要性,而且正如当地导游告诉我们的那样,它们在mamirau小径上很常见。对于灵长类动物来说,白胆鼠猴和黑脸松鼠猴分别被认为是濒危物种和脆弱物种。对于鸟类来说,冠雀被认为是脆弱的(Base de Dados Tropical, 2006)。本研究的结果表明,对大多数被研究物种来说,在有游客和没有游客的小径上观察到的动物数量没有统计学上的显著差异。只有一种灵长类动物(黑脸松鼠猴)和一种鸟类(黑额尼龙鸟)在有无游客的分析中存在统计学显著差异(t检验:t = - 2.27;p = 0.0267, Mann-Whitney U = 207.5;P = 0.0025)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is it Feasible? Positioning Feasibility Analysis as a Valuable Tool For Assessing a Potential Tourism Development Urban Tourism Districts: A Taxonomy and a Study of a New Proposed Type Management Development Skills in the Hospitality and Tourism Sector: Needs and Issues from a Regional Perspective Contributors Developing Effective Strategies for Tackling Seasonality in the Tourism Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1