The Comparison Between the “Moby Dick” and “The Old Man and the Sea” from the Perspective of Ecocriticism

Shanyu Lin
{"title":"The Comparison Between the “Moby Dick” and “The Old Man and the Sea” from the Perspective of Ecocriticism","authors":"Shanyu Lin","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201127.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecocriticism focuses on the relationship between literature and natural environment and advocates the application of ecological concepts in literary research and the reading and criticism of literary works from the perspective of ecology. Ecocriticism takes the overall interests of the ecosystem as the highest value, opposing anthropocentrism, and holds that human and nature are equal, and that human is the son of nature and a part of nature. Through the lens of ecological criticism, this article briefly introduces the ecological criticism of positive thinking, reverse thinking and the significance of ecological criticism and analyses the protagonists in \"Moby Dick\" and \"The Old Man and the Sea\" symbolizing disparate anthropocentrism to help people better understand the two works, so that people can get rid of the values of anthropocentrism, at the meanwhile, set up the right values.","PeriodicalId":345551,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201127.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecocriticism focuses on the relationship between literature and natural environment and advocates the application of ecological concepts in literary research and the reading and criticism of literary works from the perspective of ecology. Ecocriticism takes the overall interests of the ecosystem as the highest value, opposing anthropocentrism, and holds that human and nature are equal, and that human is the son of nature and a part of nature. Through the lens of ecological criticism, this article briefly introduces the ecological criticism of positive thinking, reverse thinking and the significance of ecological criticism and analyses the protagonists in "Moby Dick" and "The Old Man and the Sea" symbolizing disparate anthropocentrism to help people better understand the two works, so that people can get rid of the values of anthropocentrism, at the meanwhile, set up the right values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态批评视角下的《白鲸记》与《老人与海》比较
生态批评关注文学与自然环境的关系,提倡将生态观念应用于文学研究,从生态学的角度对文学作品进行阅读和批评。生态批评以生态系统的整体利益为最高价值,反对人类中心主义,认为人与自然是平等的,人是自然之子,是自然的一部分。本文通过生态批评的视角,简要介绍了生态批评的积极思维、逆向思维和生态批评的意义,并分析了《白鲸记》和《老人与海》中象征着截然不同的人类中心主义的主人公,帮助人们更好地理解两部作品,从而在摆脱人类中心主义价值观的同时树立正确的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Comparison Between the “Moby Dick” and “The Old Man and the Sea” from the Perspective of Ecocriticism Study on the Pragmatic Function of Kinship Appellation in Uyghur Language Inspirations of Automatic Speech Production Research to Foreign Language Teaching Exploration and Practice of Integrating Chinese Character Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools into Excellent Traditional Chinese Culture A Study of the Chaghatay Literature “The Poetry of Meshreb”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1