PARTYCYPACY BUDGET AS A CROSSING OF CIVIL ACTIVITY: POLISH MODEL ON THE EXAMPLE OF POZNAŃ

N. Holubiak
{"title":"PARTYCYPACY BUDGET AS A CROSSING OF CIVIL ACTIVITY: POLISH MODEL ON THE EXAMPLE OF POZNAŃ","authors":"N. Holubiak","doi":"10.31471/2304-7410-2018-6(50)-32-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author sets the task to study the impact of new mechanisms of direct democracy (participatory budget) on attracting and activating the population to local public policy. The organization of participatory budgeting is a manifestation of direct democracy that allows citizens to express their approval or disapproval of the actions taken by local authorities. \nThis article presents the Polish experience of implementing a public budget on the example of the city of Poznan, which was one of the first cities in Poland to introduce a civic budget in 2012. It should be added that there is no one model of the participatory budget in Poland. Each municipality and city introduce its own rules, often guided by existing examples, often don’t conducting social consultations and don’t working out the principles of the civic budget together with the residents. \nThe normative, qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the civic budgets of Poznan (number of voters and number of submitted projects, motivation for participation in the voting, public control, application of electronic platforms) are analyzed. \nIn the addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the process of participatory budget are summed up, the activation of citizens is especially noted at the voting stage and low awareness of intermediate stages of the civil budget.","PeriodicalId":409379,"journal":{"name":"PRECARPATHIAN BULLETIN OF THE SHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Idea","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRECARPATHIAN BULLETIN OF THE SHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Idea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7410-2018-6(50)-32-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author sets the task to study the impact of new mechanisms of direct democracy (participatory budget) on attracting and activating the population to local public policy. The organization of participatory budgeting is a manifestation of direct democracy that allows citizens to express their approval or disapproval of the actions taken by local authorities. This article presents the Polish experience of implementing a public budget on the example of the city of Poznan, which was one of the first cities in Poland to introduce a civic budget in 2012. It should be added that there is no one model of the participatory budget in Poland. Each municipality and city introduce its own rules, often guided by existing examples, often don’t conducting social consultations and don’t working out the principles of the civic budget together with the residents. The normative, qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the civic budgets of Poznan (number of voters and number of submitted projects, motivation for participation in the voting, public control, application of electronic platforms) are analyzed. In the addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the process of participatory budget are summed up, the activation of citizens is especially noted at the voting stage and low awareness of intermediate stages of the civil budget.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚会预算作为公民活动的一个交叉点:以poznaŃ为例的波兰模式
作者的任务是研究直接民主新机制(参与式预算)对吸引和激活人口参与地方公共政策的影响。参与预算制是市民对地方当局的行为表达赞成或反对意见的直接民主主义的表现形式。本文以波兰波兹南市为例介绍波兰实施公共预算的经验,波兹南市是波兰最早于2012年引入公民预算的城市之一。应该补充的是,在波兰没有参与性预算的单一模式。每个直辖市和城市都有自己的规则,往往以现有的例子为指导,往往不进行社会咨询,也不与居民一起制定公民预算原则。分析了波兹南公民预算的规范性、定性和定量特征(选民数量和提交项目数量、参与投票的动机、公共控制、电子平台的应用)。此外,总结了参与式预算过程的利弊,特别注意公民在投票阶段的激活性和中间阶段对公民预算的认知度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NEW TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARTY SYSTEM OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC REVOLUTION AND STATUS OF WOMEN: GENDER AND POLITICAL ASPECTS PARTYCYPACY BUDGET AS A CROSSING OF CIVIL ACTIVITY: POLISH MODEL ON THE EXAMPLE OF POZNAŃ SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL-EDUCATIONAL LIFE OF THE POBEREZHIA VILLAGE IN 1919-1939 UKRAINIAN POLITICAL ELITE: SOCIAL EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT BY DOMESTIC SCIENTISTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1