{"title":"UKRAINIAN POLITICAL ELITE: SOCIAL EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT BY DOMESTIC SCIENTISTS","authors":"Л. В. Білоус","doi":"10.31471/2304-7410-2018-6(50)-21-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the analysis of domestic scientists` research on the Ukrainian political elite social effectiveness and provides the coverage of their activity assessment in terms of publicinterests realization. \nIt is noted that among the numerous works of domestic scientists on the consideration of certain aspects of the Ukrainian political elite formation and functioning processes there are A. Pakhariev`s, F. Rudych`s, O. Hladkyi`s, M. Holovatyi`s, M. Shulha`s, M. Mykhailychenko`s, I. Pobochii`s, Y. Shaihorodskyi’s and many other`s researches where the matter is raised. \nIt is noticed that the scientists mainly negatively evaluate the political elite`s social activity in the period of Ukrainian independence. They emphasize that the “formal” political elite, “pseudoelite” of Ukraine is not solid and cohesive. They are not capable of thinking strategically and on a large scale, they are not ready to take historical responsibility for the society`s fate as a whole, adequately protect national interests, fight against corruption and, in general, resolutely carry out reforms. Domestic scientists emphasize that the Ukrainian political elite in their activity are still motivated mainly by their own narrow business interests, but not the interests of the society and the state. \nThe article suggests that the political elite social activity negative assessment bythe domestic scientists is a general theoretical reflection of people`s real distrust of the Ukrainian authority because of political crisis, corruption, low salaries and high prices, inflation, forced emigration abroad, the conflict in the East and so on as various opinion polls show. \nThe analysis of the scientific researches on our country`s political elite social effectiveness assessment has also made it possible to single out the scientists` vision of certain conditions under which a successful fulfillment of the elite`s social transformation subject function is possible.","PeriodicalId":409379,"journal":{"name":"PRECARPATHIAN BULLETIN OF THE SHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Idea","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRECARPATHIAN BULLETIN OF THE SHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Idea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7410-2018-6(50)-21-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article deals with the analysis of domestic scientists` research on the Ukrainian political elite social effectiveness and provides the coverage of their activity assessment in terms of publicinterests realization.
It is noted that among the numerous works of domestic scientists on the consideration of certain aspects of the Ukrainian political elite formation and functioning processes there are A. Pakhariev`s, F. Rudych`s, O. Hladkyi`s, M. Holovatyi`s, M. Shulha`s, M. Mykhailychenko`s, I. Pobochii`s, Y. Shaihorodskyi’s and many other`s researches where the matter is raised.
It is noticed that the scientists mainly negatively evaluate the political elite`s social activity in the period of Ukrainian independence. They emphasize that the “formal” political elite, “pseudoelite” of Ukraine is not solid and cohesive. They are not capable of thinking strategically and on a large scale, they are not ready to take historical responsibility for the society`s fate as a whole, adequately protect national interests, fight against corruption and, in general, resolutely carry out reforms. Domestic scientists emphasize that the Ukrainian political elite in their activity are still motivated mainly by their own narrow business interests, but not the interests of the society and the state.
The article suggests that the political elite social activity negative assessment bythe domestic scientists is a general theoretical reflection of people`s real distrust of the Ukrainian authority because of political crisis, corruption, low salaries and high prices, inflation, forced emigration abroad, the conflict in the East and so on as various opinion polls show.
The analysis of the scientific researches on our country`s political elite social effectiveness assessment has also made it possible to single out the scientists` vision of certain conditions under which a successful fulfillment of the elite`s social transformation subject function is possible.
本文对国内科学家对乌克兰政治精英社会效能的研究进行了分析,并从公共利益实现的角度对其活动进行了评估。值得注意的是,在国内科学家关于考虑乌克兰政治精英形成和运作过程某些方面的众多著作中,有A. Pakhariev, F. Rudych, O. Hladkyi, M. Holovatyi, M. Shulha, M. Mykhailychenko, I. Pobochii, Y. Shaihorodskyi和许多其他研究提出了这个问题。值得注意的是,科学家们对乌克兰独立时期政治精英的社会活动主要持负面评价。他们强调,乌克兰的“正式”政治精英、“伪精英”并不稳固,也没有凝聚力。他们没有战略思维和全局思维,没有为整个社会的命运承担历史责任,没有充分维护国家利益,没有反腐败斗争,没有坚决进行改革。国内科学家强调,乌克兰政治精英的活动仍然主要是出于他们自己狭隘的商业利益,而不是社会和国家的利益。文章认为,国内科学家对政治精英社会活动的负面评价是人们对乌克兰当局的真实不信任的一般理论反映,因为各种民意调查显示,政治危机、腐败、低工资和高物价、通货膨胀、被迫移民国外、东部冲突等。通过对我国政治精英社会效能评价的科学研究分析,也可以梳理出科学家对精英社会转型主体功能成功实现的一定条件的设想。