Values-Based Medicine (VsBM) and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)

Ahmed Ammar
{"title":"Values-Based Medicine (VsBM) and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)","authors":"Ahmed Ammar","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical care is a dynamic process to implement and use the most recent tech-nologies, skills, and knowledge to either maintain the good health of people or to treat sick patients. Patients have the right to receive the best possible available treatment. During the course of treatment, the patient’s dignity and rights should be respected and never be compromised. A patient’s right to be properly treated is one of the fundamental human rights. The healthcare system is responsible for providing efficient and sufficient healthcare facilities and training and continuously educating able medical and paramedical teams. Evidence-based medicine has been popularized in the last 40–50 years in order to raise the standard of medical practice. Medical ethics and values have been associated with medical practice for thousands of years since patients felt the need for treatment. There is no conflict between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine, as the medical practice should be always preformed within a frame of ethics and respect of patient’s values. Observing the principles of values-based medicine became very relevant as multicultural societies are dominant in some countries and hospitals in different corners of the world.","PeriodicalId":421156,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics in Principle and Praxis - Conceptual Foundations","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroethics in Principle and Praxis - Conceptual Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.88393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Medical care is a dynamic process to implement and use the most recent tech-nologies, skills, and knowledge to either maintain the good health of people or to treat sick patients. Patients have the right to receive the best possible available treatment. During the course of treatment, the patient’s dignity and rights should be respected and never be compromised. A patient’s right to be properly treated is one of the fundamental human rights. The healthcare system is responsible for providing efficient and sufficient healthcare facilities and training and continuously educating able medical and paramedical teams. Evidence-based medicine has been popularized in the last 40–50 years in order to raise the standard of medical practice. Medical ethics and values have been associated with medical practice for thousands of years since patients felt the need for treatment. There is no conflict between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine, as the medical practice should be always preformed within a frame of ethics and respect of patient’s values. Observing the principles of values-based medicine became very relevant as multicultural societies are dominant in some countries and hospitals in different corners of the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价值观医学(VsBM)和循证医学(EBM)
医疗保健是一个动态的过程,需要实施和使用最新的技术、技能和知识来维持人们的健康或治疗病人。患者有权接受尽可能最好的治疗。在治疗过程中,患者的尊严和权利应得到尊重,绝不能妥协。病人得到适当治疗的权利是一项基本人权。医疗保健系统负责提供高效和充足的医疗设施,培训和持续教育有能力的医疗和辅助医疗团队。为了提高医疗实践水平,循证医学在近四五十年来得到了广泛的推广。几千年来,自从病人感到需要治疗以来,医学伦理和价值观就与医疗实践联系在一起。循证医学和基于价值观的医学之间没有冲突,因为医疗实践应该始终在道德框架内进行,并尊重患者的价值观。由于多元文化社会在世界不同角落的一些国家和医院占主导地位,遵守以价值观为基础的医学原则变得非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Values-Based Medicine (VsBM) and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Terminality Advance Directives and Nursing Practice in Brazil: Bioethical Issues Doing and Being: A Metaphysic of Persons from an Ontology of Action Introductory Chapter: Reconciling Neurobioethics through Nature’s Lens - Metaphysical Determinants of Subjectivity Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1