Perspectives, Constructs And Methods In The Measurement Of Multimorbidity And Comorbidity: A Critical Review

T. Haregu, B. Oldenburg, G. Setswe, J. Elliott
{"title":"Perspectives, Constructs And Methods In The Measurement Of Multimorbidity And Comorbidity: A Critical Review","authors":"T. Haregu, B. Oldenburg, G. Setswe, J. Elliott","doi":"10.5580/2CC3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no question about the importance of measuring multimorbidity and comorbidity. However, reviews of measures of multimorbidity/comorbidity are limited to multimorbidity indices that are used to predict mortality, disability, healthrelated quality of life and healthcare costs at individual level. Objective: To describe the perspectives, constructs and methods used in the measurement of multimorbidity and comorbidity. Methods: A structured literature search for studies reporting the measurement of multimorbidity or comorbidity was conducted in Medline and Embase. The references of the identified papers were consulted without restriction. The methods used by other researches that have reported on multimorbidity and comorbidity were also reviewed. The findings of the review are summarized under major constructs of multimorbidity and comorbidity. Results: Multimorbidity/comorbidity measurements involve the consideration of several perspectives. The four major constructs of multimorbidity/comorbidity measurement are magnitude, severity, pattern and burden. There are two major approaches of measuring multimorbidity and comorbidity. The first approach reduces measurements of multiple diseases to a single condition and the second approach uses clustering of diseases and cases in to relevant non-random groups. Conclusion: The measurement of multimorbidity involves multiple perspectives, constructs and methods.","PeriodicalId":247354,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2CC3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: There is no question about the importance of measuring multimorbidity and comorbidity. However, reviews of measures of multimorbidity/comorbidity are limited to multimorbidity indices that are used to predict mortality, disability, healthrelated quality of life and healthcare costs at individual level. Objective: To describe the perspectives, constructs and methods used in the measurement of multimorbidity and comorbidity. Methods: A structured literature search for studies reporting the measurement of multimorbidity or comorbidity was conducted in Medline and Embase. The references of the identified papers were consulted without restriction. The methods used by other researches that have reported on multimorbidity and comorbidity were also reviewed. The findings of the review are summarized under major constructs of multimorbidity and comorbidity. Results: Multimorbidity/comorbidity measurements involve the consideration of several perspectives. The four major constructs of multimorbidity/comorbidity measurement are magnitude, severity, pattern and burden. There are two major approaches of measuring multimorbidity and comorbidity. The first approach reduces measurements of multiple diseases to a single condition and the second approach uses clustering of diseases and cases in to relevant non-random groups. Conclusion: The measurement of multimorbidity involves multiple perspectives, constructs and methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重病和共病测量的观点、结构和方法:综述
背景:测量多病和共病的重要性是毋庸置疑的。然而,对多重疾病/共病措施的审查仅限于用于预测死亡率、残疾、与健康相关的生活质量和个人医疗保健费用的多重疾病指数。目的:介绍多病和共病测量的视角、结构和方法。方法:在Medline和Embase中对报道多重疾病或共病测量的研究进行结构化文献检索。不受限制地查阅了所确定论文的参考文献。并对多病和共病的研究方法进行了综述。本文根据多病和共病的主要概念对研究结果进行了总结。结果:多病/共病的测量涉及到几个方面的考虑。多重疾病/共病测量的四个主要结构是量级、严重程度、模式和负担。有两种主要的方法来测量多重病和共病。第一种方法将多种疾病的测量减少到单一条件,第二种方法将疾病和病例聚类到相关的非随机组中。结论:多重发病率的测量涉及多个视角、结构和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Participation Rates In Epidemiology Studies And Surveys: A Review 2007–2015 Population Migration Through Railroads And Spatial Diffusion Of Polio In India: A Cross-Sectional Pr Adjusting Structural Equation Modelling Of Spiritual Coping Scale: Use Of The Sattora-Bentler Method As An Alternative To Maximum Likelihood Estimation An Approach to Comparing Nations for Inclusion of Studies in Health-based Systematic Literature Reviews Perspectives, Constructs And Methods In The Measurement Of Multimorbidity And Comorbidity: A Critical Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1