Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT REGE-Revista de Gestao Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rege.2017.07.002
José Glauber Cavalcante dos Santos, Thalita Silva Calíope, José de Paula Barros Neto
{"title":"Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa","authors":"José Glauber Cavalcante dos Santos,&nbsp;Thalita Silva Calíope,&nbsp;José de Paula Barros Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.rege.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Qualitative methods have been increasingly used as a research strategy. As a qualitative strategy, action research naturally holds its origins like that methodological pole. However, action research has an identity marked by the rupture with pre‐conceived models, both in the field of quantitative studies and in the scope of qualitative investigations. This work aimed to describe and discuss the main aspects related to the achievement of action research as a research strategy in the areas of administration and accounting in Brazil. A panorama has been drawn from the origin of action research to its purposes, limitations, planning and application, including dialogue with other qualitative “methods”. In this study, it was identified that action research, despite being placed as a central strategy of studies, did not necessarily have its application, which would indicate the lack of knowledge or misapplication of this strategy in the field of study. Although there are some striking features of action research, such as the need to involve the researcher in solving a problem and with other project participants, or the implementation and maintenance of a change, there is still controversy over what is in fact Action research, including about its application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43596,"journal":{"name":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2017.07.002","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227617300085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Qualitative methods have been increasingly used as a research strategy. As a qualitative strategy, action research naturally holds its origins like that methodological pole. However, action research has an identity marked by the rupture with pre‐conceived models, both in the field of quantitative studies and in the scope of qualitative investigations. This work aimed to describe and discuss the main aspects related to the achievement of action research as a research strategy in the areas of administration and accounting in Brazil. A panorama has been drawn from the origin of action research to its purposes, limitations, planning and application, including dialogue with other qualitative “methods”. In this study, it was identified that action research, despite being placed as a central strategy of studies, did not necessarily have its application, which would indicate the lack of knowledge or misapplication of this strategy in the field of study. Although there are some striking features of action research, such as the need to involve the researcher in solving a problem and with other project participants, or the implementation and maintenance of a change, there is still controversy over what is in fact Action research, including about its application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特别会议-快速通道SEMEAD:在这项研究中有行动吗?作为定性研究策略的行动研究调查
定性方法越来越多地被用作一种研究策略。作为一种定性策略,行动研究自然像方法论极点一样拥有它的起源。然而,无论是在定量研究领域还是在定性研究领域,行动研究都具有与预先设想的模型决裂的特征。这项工作旨在描述和讨论与作为巴西行政和会计领域研究战略的行动研究成果有关的主要方面。从行动研究的起源到它的目的、限制、规划和应用,包括与其他定性“方法”的对话,都描绘了一个全景。在这项研究中,确定了行动研究尽管被列为研究的中心战略,但不一定有其应用,这将表明在研究领域缺乏对这一战略的了解或误用。尽管行动研究有一些显著的特点,比如需要研究者参与解决问题,与其他项目参与者一起,或者实施和维护一个变化,但对于什么是行动研究,包括它的应用,仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Comportamento de cidadania organizacional: sua interação com os valores organizacionais e a satisfação no trabalho Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta Participação social nos serviços públicos: caracterização do estado da arte por meio da bibliometria e da revisão sistemática Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Potencialidades e desafios na articulação entre a memória e a aprendizagem organizacional: o Centro de Memória Bunge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1