Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT REGE-Revista de Gestao Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rege.2017.05.007
Marli Appel da Silva , Guilherme Welter Wendt , Irani Iracema de Lima Argimon
{"title":"Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta","authors":"Marli Appel da Silva ,&nbsp;Guilherme Welter Wendt ,&nbsp;Irani Iracema de Lima Argimon","doi":"10.1016/j.rege.2017.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures<sup>1</sup> of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire I (COPSOQ I), medium version, proposing its short version suitable to Brazilian Portuguese. The COPSOQ aims to analyze the psychosocial factors at work, assuming that the aspects of work are related to quality of life. 1,615 Brazilian employees comprised the sample. The instrument was tested by using the following techniques: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Structural Regression Model and Multi‐Group Analysis, among others. Analyses indicated the instrument’ reliability, construct validity, and predictive capacity. The final structural regression model reached recommended indicators of quality (eg., X<sup>2</sup>/DF<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.19, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.96, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03, and SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.06). The work factors (Production and Tasks, Job Resources, Interpersonal Relations and Management) were significantly (<em>p ≤</em> 0,05) related to quality of life (Health &amp; Wellbeing, Satisfaction at Work). The Health and Wellbeing factor explained 28% of the model variance and satisfaction explained 21%. Overall, our findings validate theoretical hypothesis which supports the COPSOQ.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43596,"journal":{"name":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 348-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2017.05.007","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227616306038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The current study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures1 of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire I (COPSOQ I), medium version, proposing its short version suitable to Brazilian Portuguese. The COPSOQ aims to analyze the psychosocial factors at work, assuming that the aspects of work are related to quality of life. 1,615 Brazilian employees comprised the sample. The instrument was tested by using the following techniques: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Structural Regression Model and Multi‐Group Analysis, among others. Analyses indicated the instrument’ reliability, construct validity, and predictive capacity. The final structural regression model reached recommended indicators of quality (eg., X2/DF = 1.19, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.03, and SRMR = 0.06). The work factors (Production and Tasks, Job Resources, Interpersonal Relations and Management) were significantly (p ≤ 0,05) related to quality of life (Health & Wellbeing, Satisfaction at Work). The Health and Wellbeing factor explained 28% of the model variance and satisfaction explained 21%. Overall, our findings validate theoretical hypothesis which supports the COPSOQ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥本哈根社会心理问卷I (COPSOQ I)测量的心理测量特性
本研究旨在评估《哥本哈根社会心理问卷I》(COPSOQ I)中版本测量方法1的心理测量特性,提出适合巴西葡萄牙语的短版本。COPSOQ旨在分析工作中的社会心理因素,假设工作的各个方面与生活质量有关。样本包括1615名巴西员工。该仪器通过以下技术进行了测试:探索性和验证性因素分析,结构回归模型和多组分析等。分析表明,该工具具有良好的信度、结构效度和预测能力。最终的结构回归模型达到了推荐的质量指标(如。X2 / DF = 1.19, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.03, SRMR = 0.06)。工作因素(生产与任务、工作资源、人际关系与管理)与生活质量(健康与生活质量)显著相关(p≤0.05)。幸福,工作满意度)。健康和幸福因素解释了28%的模型方差,满意度解释了21%。总的来说,我们的研究结果验证了支持COPSOQ的理论假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Comportamento de cidadania organizacional: sua interação com os valores organizacionais e a satisfação no trabalho Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta Participação social nos serviços públicos: caracterização do estado da arte por meio da bibliometria e da revisão sistemática Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Potencialidades e desafios na articulação entre a memória e a aprendizagem organizacional: o Centro de Memória Bunge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1