Future Video Coding Technologies: A Performance Evaluation of AV1, JEM, VP9, and HM

Tung Nguyen, D. Marpe
{"title":"Future Video Coding Technologies: A Performance Evaluation of AV1, JEM, VP9, and HM","authors":"Tung Nguyen, D. Marpe","doi":"10.1109/PCS.2018.8456289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents and discusses an objective performance evaluation of two lines of development for the next generation of video coding schemes: AV1 of the Alliance for Open Media (AOM) and JEM of the Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET). Their already established predecessors, as given by VP9 for AV1 and High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) for JEM, serve as references for this evaluation process. A large testset of 28 video sequences with different content, various resolution, and different frame rate has been used as the common data basis. For each sequence and each test candidate, four different rate points associated with varying qualities of reconstruction have been generated. When evaluated in this way relative to their corresponding predecessors, AV1 and JEM show a quite significant coding-efficiency improvement in terms of averaged Bjøntegaard-Delta (BD) bit rate of about 23% and about 32%, respectively. Moreover, this performance study also reveals that there exist different trade-offs between compression efficiency and computational complexity in terms of encoder run time. While the JEM encoder requires a factor of about 8.5 in run time relative to HM, the corresponding run time factor for the AV1 encoder is about 55.8 relative to VP9. When comparing the next-generation coding schemes among each other, this study reveals that AV1 requires an average BD bit-rate overhead of about 49% at the same objective quality while consuming 2.47 times the run time of the JEM encoder.","PeriodicalId":433667,"journal":{"name":"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCS.2018.8456289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses an objective performance evaluation of two lines of development for the next generation of video coding schemes: AV1 of the Alliance for Open Media (AOM) and JEM of the Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET). Their already established predecessors, as given by VP9 for AV1 and High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) for JEM, serve as references for this evaluation process. A large testset of 28 video sequences with different content, various resolution, and different frame rate has been used as the common data basis. For each sequence and each test candidate, four different rate points associated with varying qualities of reconstruction have been generated. When evaluated in this way relative to their corresponding predecessors, AV1 and JEM show a quite significant coding-efficiency improvement in terms of averaged Bjøntegaard-Delta (BD) bit rate of about 23% and about 32%, respectively. Moreover, this performance study also reveals that there exist different trade-offs between compression efficiency and computational complexity in terms of encoder run time. While the JEM encoder requires a factor of about 8.5 in run time relative to HM, the corresponding run time factor for the AV1 encoder is about 55.8 relative to VP9. When comparing the next-generation coding schemes among each other, this study reveals that AV1 requires an average BD bit-rate overhead of about 49% at the same objective quality while consuming 2.47 times the run time of the JEM encoder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来视频编码技术:AV1、JEM、VP9和HM的性能评估
本文提出并讨论了对下一代视频编码方案的两条发展路线的客观性能评估:开放媒体联盟(AOM)的AV1和联合视频探索小组(JVET)的JEM。它们已经建立的前辈,如AV1的VP9和JEM的高效视频编码(HEVC),可以作为评估过程的参考。使用28个不同内容、不同分辨率、不同帧率的视频序列的大型测试集作为通用数据基础。对于每个序列和每个候选测试,生成了与不同重建质量相关的四个不同速率点。当以这种方式进行评估时,AV1和JEM在平均Bjøntegaard-Delta (BD)比特率方面分别显示出相当显著的编码效率提高,分别约为23%和32%。此外,这项性能研究还表明,在编码器运行时间方面,压缩效率和计算复杂性之间存在不同的权衡。相对于HM, JEM编码器需要8.5倍的运行时间,而AV1编码器对应的运行时间因子相对于VP9大约是55.8倍。通过对下一代编码方案的比较,本研究发现,在相同的物象质量下,AV1的平均BD比特率开销约为49%,而其运行时间是JEM编码器的2.47倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Video Coding Technologies: A Performance Evaluation of AV1, JEM, VP9, and HM Joint Optimization of Rate, Distortion, and Maximum Absolute Error for Compression of Medical Volumes Using HEVC Intra Wavelet Decomposition Pre-processing for Spatial Scalability Video Compression Scheme Detecting Source Video Artifacts with Supervised Sparse Filters Perceptually-Aligned Frame Rate Selection Using Spatio-Temporal Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1