Time-Domain Diffraction Modelling With Mean Force Effects and Experimental Comparison for Slack-Moored M4 Wave Energy Converter

P. Stansby, E. C. Moreno
{"title":"Time-Domain Diffraction Modelling With Mean Force Effects and Experimental Comparison for Slack-Moored M4 Wave Energy Converter","authors":"P. Stansby, E. C. Moreno","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-96756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Linear diffraction modelling of irregular wave structure interaction is standard practice in both the frequency and time domains for fixed and floating bodies. This has been extended for the modular wave energy converter M4 with multiple floats and power take offs. In the time domain second-order forces assuming a stationary body have been added for floating wind energy platforms. This misses second-order, including mean, effects due to radiation damping, drag forces and the mechanical damping of wave energy conversion. If these are linearized they may be included in a frequency domain analysis. However mechanical damping and mooring forces on slack-moored platforms are generally highly nonlinear and time domain analysis is required. In this paper response is first computed with linear analysis and mechanical damping which has been shown to give reasonable prediction of experimental measurement for the response and power output of M4. The response gives the absorbed energy flux due to mechanical and radiation damping which is converted into a mean force through an average wave celerity. The model is extended to include a mooring and these mean forces; the computation is then repeated. The mean forces have negligible effect on response and associated power take off but determine the mooring forces. For a slack mooring zero stiffness is assumed. Comparing with wave basin experiments for the 6-float M4 configuration in operational conditions, mean mooring forces are generally underestimated, markedly for larger periods.","PeriodicalId":120800,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Rodney Eatock Taylor Honoring Symposium on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics; Takeshi Kinoshita Honoring Symposium on Offshore Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Rodney Eatock Taylor Honoring Symposium on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics; Takeshi Kinoshita Honoring Symposium on Offshore Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Linear diffraction modelling of irregular wave structure interaction is standard practice in both the frequency and time domains for fixed and floating bodies. This has been extended for the modular wave energy converter M4 with multiple floats and power take offs. In the time domain second-order forces assuming a stationary body have been added for floating wind energy platforms. This misses second-order, including mean, effects due to radiation damping, drag forces and the mechanical damping of wave energy conversion. If these are linearized they may be included in a frequency domain analysis. However mechanical damping and mooring forces on slack-moored platforms are generally highly nonlinear and time domain analysis is required. In this paper response is first computed with linear analysis and mechanical damping which has been shown to give reasonable prediction of experimental measurement for the response and power output of M4. The response gives the absorbed energy flux due to mechanical and radiation damping which is converted into a mean force through an average wave celerity. The model is extended to include a mooring and these mean forces; the computation is then repeated. The mean forces have negligible effect on response and associated power take off but determine the mooring forces. For a slack mooring zero stiffness is assumed. Comparing with wave basin experiments for the 6-float M4 configuration in operational conditions, mean mooring forces are generally underestimated, markedly for larger periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
松弛系泊M4波浪能转换器平均力效应时域衍射模型及实验比较
不规则波结构相互作用的线性衍射模型是固定和浮动体在频率和时间域的标准做法。这已经扩展到具有多个浮子和功率起飞的模块化波浪能量转换器M4。在时域中,对浮式风能平台加入了假定静止体的二阶力。这忽略了二阶,包括平均,由于辐射阻尼,阻力和波能转换的机械阻尼的影响。如果这些是线性化的,它们可以包含在频域分析中。然而,拖地系泊平台的机械阻尼和系泊力通常是高度非线性的,需要进行时域分析。本文首先用线性分析和机械阻尼法计算了响应,结果表明,该方法可以合理地预测M4的响应和输出功率。响应给出了由于机械和辐射阻尼而吸收的能量通量,它通过平均波速转换为平均力。将模型扩展到包括系泊和这些平均力;然后重复计算。平均力对响应和相关起飞功率的影响可以忽略不计,但决定了系泊力。对于松弛系泊,假定为零刚度。与运行条件下6浮子M4配置的波盆实验相比,平均系泊力通常被低估,特别是在更长的周期内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time-Domain Diffraction Modelling With Mean Force Effects and Experimental Comparison for Slack-Moored M4 Wave Energy Converter Hydroelastic Analysis and Validation of an End-Anchored Floating Bridge Under Wave and Current Loads Nonlinear Analysis of a Heaving Point Absorber in Frequency Domain via Statistical Linearization Evaluation of Flow Field in the Layouts of Cross-Shaped Artificial Reefs Experimental Study of the Effect of the Pontoon Presence on the Flow-Induced Motion of a Semi-Submersible Platform With Four Square Columns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1