When Optimized N-Detect Test Sets are Biased: An Investigation of Cell-Aware-Type Faults and N-Detect Stuck-At ATPG

Fanchen Zhang, Micah Thornton, Jennifer Dworak
{"title":"When Optimized N-Detect Test Sets are Biased: An Investigation of Cell-Aware-Type Faults and N-Detect Stuck-At ATPG","authors":"Fanchen Zhang, Micah Thornton, Jennifer Dworak","doi":"10.1109/NATW.2014.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cell-aware faults have previously been proposed to more effectively detect defects within gates. At the same time, n-detect test sets that provide multiple detections of each stuck-at fault are often used to maximize the detection of unmodeled defects. However, n-detect test sets are often not particularly effective at fortuitously detecting all untargeted cell-aware faults. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of different types of n-detect ATPG test sets for efficiently detecting difficult cell-aware-type faults and explain why optimizing test sets for n- detect using stuck-at faults while still keeping pattern counts low can actually bias those test sets against the detection of some cell-aware type faults. We then investigate the addition of cell-aware top-off patterns for cell-aware-type faults that are shown to be functionally relevant through good state simulation, allowing such faults to be prioritized when testing resources are limited.","PeriodicalId":283155,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 23rd North Atlantic Test Workshop","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 23rd North Atlantic Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NATW.2014.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Cell-aware faults have previously been proposed to more effectively detect defects within gates. At the same time, n-detect test sets that provide multiple detections of each stuck-at fault are often used to maximize the detection of unmodeled defects. However, n-detect test sets are often not particularly effective at fortuitously detecting all untargeted cell-aware faults. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of different types of n-detect ATPG test sets for efficiently detecting difficult cell-aware-type faults and explain why optimizing test sets for n- detect using stuck-at faults while still keeping pattern counts low can actually bias those test sets against the detection of some cell-aware type faults. We then investigate the addition of cell-aware top-off patterns for cell-aware-type faults that are shown to be functionally relevant through good state simulation, allowing such faults to be prioritized when testing resources are limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当优化的n -检测测试集有偏差时:细胞感知型故障和n -检测卡在ATPG的研究
细胞感知故障先前被提出用于更有效地检测门内的缺陷。同时,n-detect测试集提供对每个卡在故障的多个检测,通常用于最大限度地检测未建模的缺陷。然而,n-detect测试集在偶然检测所有非目标细胞感知故障时通常不是特别有效。在本文中,我们研究了不同类型的n检测ATPG测试集在有效检测困难的细胞感知型故障方面的有效性,并解释了为什么在使用卡在故障优化n检测测试集的同时仍然保持低模式计数实际上会使这些测试集对某些细胞感知型故障的检测产生偏差。然后,我们研究了通过良好的状态模拟显示与功能相关的单元感知型故障的单元感知顶掉模式的添加,允许在测试资源有限时对此类故障进行优先级排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power System Fault Modeling/Simulation Protective Relay Testing and Simulation A New Test Vector Search Algorithm for a Single Stuck-at Fault Using Probabilistic Correlation On-chip Clock Testing and Frequency Measurement When Optimized N-Detect Test Sets are Biased: An Investigation of Cell-Aware-Type Faults and N-Detect Stuck-At ATPG Pattern Generation for Post-Silicon Timing Validation Considering Power Supply Noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1