A Process Evaluation of Social Protection Policy in the Unconditional Cash Transfer Programme for Vulnerable People

Givemore Machimbidzofa
{"title":"A Process Evaluation of Social Protection Policy in the Unconditional Cash Transfer Programme for Vulnerable People","authors":"Givemore Machimbidzofa","doi":"10.56388/jshs220803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a Process evaluation of the Unconditional Cash Transfer (UCT), which is implemented by the International Rescue Committee (IRC), in Chipinge District. The study assessed the program's implementation methods. The study utilized a mixed methodology approach. Semi structured interviews were utilized to interview beneficiaries and project staff. A total of 10 interviewees were interviewed and 80 questionnaires were distributed to beneficiaries. Interviewees were purposely selected, and 80 questionnaire respondents were randomly selected. The author also gathered data through document analysis and observations. The study assessed if activities were being carried out according to plan, if non-cash and cash resources utilized according to plan, and whether the skills and competencies of the personnel were adequate. The study also analyzed beneficiary satisfaction and potential changes to the UCT program’s implementation. The findings were that UCT activities are being carried out according to plan. Cash and noncash resources are always available for the implementation of the UCT Programme and there is no abuse of funds. The findings indicated that the personnel are qualified enough for the implementation of the programme and that beneficiaries are satisfied with the UCT programme services. The study recommended that it might be necessary to increase the frequency of the cash transfer payments to a monthly basis instead of bi-monthly to empower the beneficiaries to generate more income. It was recommended that there be an exit strategy to phase out eligible beneficiaries and bring in new beneficiaries. It was also recommended that the payment process may be electrified to cut costs and for easy tracking of payments Since the study was based on a single case, Chipinge, it was recommended that there is need to conduct process evaluations on the UCT programme in other parts of the country to get a broader spectrum on the implementation of the UCT programme.","PeriodicalId":416554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Humanities Studies","volume":"415 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Humanities Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56388/jshs220803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is a Process evaluation of the Unconditional Cash Transfer (UCT), which is implemented by the International Rescue Committee (IRC), in Chipinge District. The study assessed the program's implementation methods. The study utilized a mixed methodology approach. Semi structured interviews were utilized to interview beneficiaries and project staff. A total of 10 interviewees were interviewed and 80 questionnaires were distributed to beneficiaries. Interviewees were purposely selected, and 80 questionnaire respondents were randomly selected. The author also gathered data through document analysis and observations. The study assessed if activities were being carried out according to plan, if non-cash and cash resources utilized according to plan, and whether the skills and competencies of the personnel were adequate. The study also analyzed beneficiary satisfaction and potential changes to the UCT program’s implementation. The findings were that UCT activities are being carried out according to plan. Cash and noncash resources are always available for the implementation of the UCT Programme and there is no abuse of funds. The findings indicated that the personnel are qualified enough for the implementation of the programme and that beneficiaries are satisfied with the UCT programme services. The study recommended that it might be necessary to increase the frequency of the cash transfer payments to a monthly basis instead of bi-monthly to empower the beneficiaries to generate more income. It was recommended that there be an exit strategy to phase out eligible beneficiaries and bring in new beneficiaries. It was also recommended that the payment process may be electrified to cut costs and for easy tracking of payments Since the study was based on a single case, Chipinge, it was recommended that there is need to conduct process evaluations on the UCT programme in other parts of the country to get a broader spectrum on the implementation of the UCT programme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弱势群体无条件现金转移方案中社会保护政策的过程评价
本研究是对国际救援委员会(IRC)在Chipinge地区实施的无条件现金转移(UCT)进行过程评价。该研究评估了该计划的实施方法。本研究采用混合方法。采用半结构化访谈对受益人和项目工作人员进行访谈。共采访了10名受访者,并向受益人分发了80份问卷。有目的地选择受访者,随机抽取80名问卷调查对象。作者还通过文献分析和观察收集数据。这项研究评估了活动是否按照计划进行,非现金和现金资源是否按照计划使用,以及工作人员的技能和能力是否足够。该研究还分析了受益人满意度和UCT计划实施的潜在变化。调查结果是,联合技术联盟的活动正在按计划进行。现金和非现金资源始终可用于实施UCT方案,不存在滥用资金的情况。调查结果表明,工作人员有足够的资格执行方案,受益人对联合培训中心的方案服务感到满意。这项研究建议,可能有必要将现金转移支付的频率提高到每月一次,而不是每两个月一次,以使受益人能够产生更多的收入。建议制定一项退出战略,逐步取消合格的受益人,并引入新的受益人。委员会还建议,付款程序可以电气化,以减少费用,并便于跟踪付款情况。由于这项研究是根据Chipinge这一单一案例进行的,因此建议有必要对该国其他地区的UCT方案进行过程评价,以便更广泛地了解UCT方案的执行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Process Evaluation of Social Protection Policy in the Unconditional Cash Transfer Programme for Vulnerable People Cultural Norms and Access to Reproductive Health Services: Implications for Maternal Health in Ethiopia Challenges and Opportunities for Cultural Diversity and Language Preservation in Nigeria The Relevance of Philosophy of Socrates to Modern Philosophy of Research Urban Social Landscape Transitions between 1990 and 2010: Case study of Wuhan, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1