{"title":"Modernism and the ‘Double Consciousness’ of Myth in Tony Harrison’s Poetry and Metamorpheus","authors":"A. Rowland","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266519.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the relationship between Tony Harrison’s work and the legacies of modernism. In the dominant version of Harrison’s relationship with modernism, the poet undergoes a ‘Eureka’ moment akin to Philip Larkin’s repudiation of Yeats when the Leeds poet begins to write The School of Eloquence sequence: switching to the example of Thomas Hardy, Larkin no longer wished, he contested, to ‘jack himself up’ into poetry, just as Harrison desires to be the poet that ‘blokes in the boozer’ might read. However, as with Larkin’s deployment of symbolist verse and references to T. S. Eliot in his later poetry, Harrison’s work does not simply repudiate modernism either. Harrison’s apparently antipathetic response to modernist literature seems to be encapsulated in Desmond Graham’s chapter on Harrison’s early poetry, in which he depicts the Leeds poet at Poetry and Audience editorial meetings, mimicking Eliot’s voice and demeanour. Yet the poetry tells a different story. In his first full collection, The Loiners, Harrison engages with a number of modernist antecedents, including Arthur Rimbaud, Joseph Conrad and Charles Baudelaire. This chapter then focuses on the modernist ‘double consciousness’ of myth that Harrison then draws on, and refines, throughout his oeuvre. Writers such as James Joyce and T.S. Eliot were the first authors to herald an intensification of writing about myth that fictionalises mythic characters rather than retaining them as symbols and narrative ballast. I explore how Harrison utilises this ‘double consciousness’ in his film-poem Metamorpheus and in the poem ‘The Grilling’ from Under the Clock.\n","PeriodicalId":315731,"journal":{"name":"New Light on Tony Harrison","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Light on Tony Harrison","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266519.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter looks at the relationship between Tony Harrison’s work and the legacies of modernism. In the dominant version of Harrison’s relationship with modernism, the poet undergoes a ‘Eureka’ moment akin to Philip Larkin’s repudiation of Yeats when the Leeds poet begins to write The School of Eloquence sequence: switching to the example of Thomas Hardy, Larkin no longer wished, he contested, to ‘jack himself up’ into poetry, just as Harrison desires to be the poet that ‘blokes in the boozer’ might read. However, as with Larkin’s deployment of symbolist verse and references to T. S. Eliot in his later poetry, Harrison’s work does not simply repudiate modernism either. Harrison’s apparently antipathetic response to modernist literature seems to be encapsulated in Desmond Graham’s chapter on Harrison’s early poetry, in which he depicts the Leeds poet at Poetry and Audience editorial meetings, mimicking Eliot’s voice and demeanour. Yet the poetry tells a different story. In his first full collection, The Loiners, Harrison engages with a number of modernist antecedents, including Arthur Rimbaud, Joseph Conrad and Charles Baudelaire. This chapter then focuses on the modernist ‘double consciousness’ of myth that Harrison then draws on, and refines, throughout his oeuvre. Writers such as James Joyce and T.S. Eliot were the first authors to herald an intensification of writing about myth that fictionalises mythic characters rather than retaining them as symbols and narrative ballast. I explore how Harrison utilises this ‘double consciousness’ in his film-poem Metamorpheus and in the poem ‘The Grilling’ from Under the Clock.
本章着眼于托尼·哈里森的作品与现代主义遗产之间的关系。在哈里森与现代主义关系的主要版本中,诗人经历了一个“顿悟”的时刻,类似于菲利普·拉金(Philip Larkin)在利兹诗人开始写《口才学院》(the School of Eloquence)时对叶芝的否定:拉金转而以托马斯·哈代(Thomas Hardy)为例,他认为,拉金不再希望“把自己”“插进”诗歌中,就像哈里森希望成为“酒吧间的家伙”可能读到的诗人一样。然而,正如拉金在后期诗歌中对象征主义诗歌的运用和对t·s·艾略特的引用一样,哈里森的作品也不是简单地否定现代主义。在戴斯蒙德·格雷厄姆关于哈里森早期诗歌的一章中,哈里森对现代主义文学明显的反感似乎得到了概括。在这一章中,他模仿艾略特的声音和举止,描绘了这位利兹诗人在《诗歌与听众》的编辑会议上的情景。然而,诗歌讲述了一个不同的故事。在他的第一个完整的作品集《流浪者》中,哈里森与一些现代主义前辈进行了接触,包括阿瑟·兰波、约瑟夫·康拉德和查尔斯·波德莱尔。这一章接着聚焦于现代主义神话的“双重意识”,哈里森随后在他的全部作品中利用并提炼了这种意识。詹姆斯·乔伊斯(James Joyce)和T.S.艾略特(T.S. Eliot)等作家率先预示着神话写作的加强,将神话人物虚构化,而不是将其保留为象征和叙事压舱物。我探讨了哈里森是如何在他的电影诗歌《变形魔》和《时钟之下》中的诗歌《拷问》中利用这种“双重意识”的。