Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies

J. Chadha, L. Corrado, Jack Meaning
{"title":"Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies","authors":"J. Chadha, L. Corrado, Jack Meaning","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2044824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The financial crisis and its aftermath has stimulated a vigorous debate on the use of macro-prudential instruments for both regulating the banking system and for providing additional tools for monetary policy makers. The widespread adoption of non-conventional monetary policies has provided some evidence on the efficacy of liquidity and asset purchases for offsetting the lower zero bound. Central banks have thus been reminded as to the effectiveness of extended open market operations as a supplementary tool of monetary policy. These tools are essentially fiscal instruments, as they issue central bank liabilities backed by fiscal transfers. And so having written these tools into the fiscal budget constraint, we can examine the consequences of these operations within the context of a micro-founded macroeconomic model of banking and money. We can mimic the responses of the Federal Reserve balance sheet to the crisis. Specifically, we examine the role of reserves for bond and capital swaps in stabilising the economy and also the impact of changing the composition of the central bank balance sheet. We find that such policies can significantly enhance the ability of the central bank to stabilise the economy. This is because balance sheet operations supply (remove) liquidity to a financial market that is otherwise short (long) of liquidity and hence allows other .nancial spreads to move less violently over the cycle to compensate.","PeriodicalId":302242,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2044824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The financial crisis and its aftermath has stimulated a vigorous debate on the use of macro-prudential instruments for both regulating the banking system and for providing additional tools for monetary policy makers. The widespread adoption of non-conventional monetary policies has provided some evidence on the efficacy of liquidity and asset purchases for offsetting the lower zero bound. Central banks have thus been reminded as to the effectiveness of extended open market operations as a supplementary tool of monetary policy. These tools are essentially fiscal instruments, as they issue central bank liabilities backed by fiscal transfers. And so having written these tools into the fiscal budget constraint, we can examine the consequences of these operations within the context of a micro-founded macroeconomic model of banking and money. We can mimic the responses of the Federal Reserve balance sheet to the crisis. Specifically, we examine the role of reserves for bond and capital swaps in stabilising the economy and also the impact of changing the composition of the central bank balance sheet. We find that such policies can significantly enhance the ability of the central bank to stabilise the economy. This is because balance sheet operations supply (remove) liquidity to a financial market that is otherwise short (long) of liquidity and hence allows other .nancial spreads to move less violently over the cycle to compensate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
储备、流动性和货币:资产负债表政策的评估
金融危机及其后果引发了一场关于使用宏观审慎工具来监管银行体系和为货币政策制定者提供额外工具的激烈辩论。非常规货币政策的广泛采用,为流动性和资产购买在抵消较低的零利率界限方面的有效性提供了一些证据。中央银行因此被提醒,扩大公开市场操作作为货币政策的补充工具是有效的。这些工具本质上是财政工具,因为它们发行由财政转移支持的央行负债。因此,将这些工具写入财政预算约束后,我们可以在微观基础的银行和货币宏观经济模型的背景下检查这些操作的后果。我们可以模仿美联储(fed)资产负债表对危机的反应。具体来说,我们研究了债券和资本互换储备在稳定经济中的作用,以及改变央行资产负债表构成的影响。我们发现,这些政策可以显著增强央行稳定经济的能力。这是因为资产负债表操作向金融市场提供(移除)流动性,而金融市场本来是做空(做多)流动性的,因此允许其他金融利差在周期中波动不那么剧烈,以进行补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Incentives and Communication Costs on Information Production and Use: Evidence from Bank Lending Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies State Aid to Business in the European Union: A Focus on the Car Sector A Conceptual Framework for Efficient Design of Counter-Obligations in Government Contracts and Licenses Banks’ Reactions to Basel-III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1