The Dark Side of Communication

P. Kastberg
{"title":"The Dark Side of Communication","authors":"P. Kastberg","doi":"10.7146/claw.v7i1.123225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The expression “the dark side” seems to have become a portmanteau term for all things opaque, unwanted or even unlawful. There is a plethora of examples to that fact – from popular culture, where the unfortunate ones may ‘turn to the dark side of the force’, to the natural sciences, where dark matter is matter that does not absorb, reflect or emit electromagnetic radiation and therefore difficult to come to terms with. Somewhat closer to home, disciplinarily speaking, in, say, strategic communication “the dark side” pertains to (corporate) communication perceived as intentionally ambiguous – and maybe unlawfully so. In organization studies, “the dark side” encompasses deviant or even harmful organizational behavior. In interpersonal communication, “the dark side” deals with immoral, dysfunctional or malicious communication. In sum, by calling forth “the dark side” of communication we intuitively seem to evoke a sort of Manichean discourse of light vs. dark, in casu: of good vs. evil communication. If we look at communication activities in organizational and/or professional contexts in lieu of this, it seems to be a question of whether communication is seen as manipulatory, i.e. as “dark”/evil, or emancipatory, i.e. as “light”/good. This, in turn, effectively stigmatizes dark side communication activities as vehicles for the (organizational or corporate) propagation of suppression of unwanted ethical, political, and ideological voices and discourses. While this is probably not altogether wrong, it is probably also not altogether always the case. With The Dark Side of Communication as the theme of the 2019 conference of the research group Communicating Organizations at Aalborg University, Denmark (https://www.en.culture.aau.dk/research/researchgroups/ComOrg/), the research group wished to explore and substantially deepen our understanding of what dark side communication activities ‘are’ and what they ‘do’ in or with reference to organizational contexts. For this conference, the Communicating Organizations research group therefore invited fellow scholars to engage in exploring and problematizing issues such as, but not limited to:","PeriodicalId":355346,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Language at Work","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Language at Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/claw.v7i1.123225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The expression “the dark side” seems to have become a portmanteau term for all things opaque, unwanted or even unlawful. There is a plethora of examples to that fact – from popular culture, where the unfortunate ones may ‘turn to the dark side of the force’, to the natural sciences, where dark matter is matter that does not absorb, reflect or emit electromagnetic radiation and therefore difficult to come to terms with. Somewhat closer to home, disciplinarily speaking, in, say, strategic communication “the dark side” pertains to (corporate) communication perceived as intentionally ambiguous – and maybe unlawfully so. In organization studies, “the dark side” encompasses deviant or even harmful organizational behavior. In interpersonal communication, “the dark side” deals with immoral, dysfunctional or malicious communication. In sum, by calling forth “the dark side” of communication we intuitively seem to evoke a sort of Manichean discourse of light vs. dark, in casu: of good vs. evil communication. If we look at communication activities in organizational and/or professional contexts in lieu of this, it seems to be a question of whether communication is seen as manipulatory, i.e. as “dark”/evil, or emancipatory, i.e. as “light”/good. This, in turn, effectively stigmatizes dark side communication activities as vehicles for the (organizational or corporate) propagation of suppression of unwanted ethical, political, and ideological voices and discourses. While this is probably not altogether wrong, it is probably also not altogether always the case. With The Dark Side of Communication as the theme of the 2019 conference of the research group Communicating Organizations at Aalborg University, Denmark (https://www.en.culture.aau.dk/research/researchgroups/ComOrg/), the research group wished to explore and substantially deepen our understanding of what dark side communication activities ‘are’ and what they ‘do’ in or with reference to organizational contexts. For this conference, the Communicating Organizations research group therefore invited fellow scholars to engage in exploring and problematizing issues such as, but not limited to:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通的阴暗面
“黑暗面”这个词似乎已经变成了一个合成词,指代所有不透明、不受欢迎甚至非法的事物。这一事实有太多的例子——从流行文化中,不幸的人可能会“转向力量的黑暗面”,到自然科学中,暗物质是不吸收、反射或发射电磁辐射的物质,因此很难接受。从学科上讲,在战略沟通中,“黑暗面”指的是(公司)沟通被认为是故意模棱两可的——而且可能是非法的。在组织研究中,“黑暗面”包括不正常甚至有害的组织行为。在人际交往中,“黑暗面”指的是不道德、功能失调或恶意的交往。总而言之,通过呼唤交流的“阴暗面”,我们直觉上似乎唤起了一种摩尼教的光明与黑暗的话语,因为:善与恶的交流。如果我们在组织和/或专业环境中看待沟通活动,这似乎是一个问题,即沟通是否被视为操纵性的,即“黑暗”/邪恶,或解放性的,即“光明”/善良。这反过来又有效地将黑暗面的传播活动污名化,使其成为(组织或公司)传播压制不受欢迎的道德、政治和意识形态声音和话语的工具。虽然这可能并非完全错误,但也可能并非总是如此。以“沟通的阴暗面”为2019年丹麦奥尔堡大学“沟通组织”研究小组(https://www.en.culture.aau.dk/research/researchgroups/ComOrg/)会议的主题,该研究小组希望探索并大大加深我们对“黑暗面”沟通活动“是”以及它们在组织环境中或与组织环境相关的“作用”的理解。因此,在本次会议上,传播组织研究小组邀请了其他学者参与探索和提出问题,例如但不限于:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dark Side of Communication A Socio-technical-cultural System Perspective to Rethinking Translation Technology in Intercultural Communication Advancing a Baradian perspective on the field of identity work Employee representations of customer harassment and its causes in self-reported tales Recruitment Communication and Psychological Contracts in Start-Ups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1