An Experience in Explicitly Training Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers in Programming Concepts with ScratchJr

J. Velázquez‐Iturbide, Pedro Paredes Barragán, J. Urquiza-Fuentes
{"title":"An Experience in Explicitly Training Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers in Programming Concepts with ScratchJr","authors":"J. Velázquez‐Iturbide, Pedro Paredes Barragán, J. Urquiza-Fuentes","doi":"10.1145/3556787.3556871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ScratchJr is a block-based language intended for young children aged 5 to 7 years old. The language and its app were developed using a learner-centered approach to make it usable and understandable to children. Obviously, Early Childhood teachers using ScratchJr must develop, as part of their content knowledge, an understanding of both the language and programming basics. Unfortunately, the materials made available by the constructors of ScratchJr were not envisaged for teacher development but for teacher instruction. Based on our concern with providing teachers a deep understanding of block-based programming, we present in the paper a study about teaching ScratchJr to pre-service teachers. It involved two groups, one trained with the materials developed by the ScratchJr creators and another one with materials that explain the run-time semantics of the different blocks of ScratchJr. The performance of both groups was compared with six questions extracted from the global exam of the course. The results show that pre-service teachers instructed with the novel approach performed better in predictive exercises or exercises focused on block understanding but performed worse in exercises consisting in translating a written behavior into scripts.","PeriodicalId":136039,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3556787.3556871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ScratchJr is a block-based language intended for young children aged 5 to 7 years old. The language and its app were developed using a learner-centered approach to make it usable and understandable to children. Obviously, Early Childhood teachers using ScratchJr must develop, as part of their content knowledge, an understanding of both the language and programming basics. Unfortunately, the materials made available by the constructors of ScratchJr were not envisaged for teacher development but for teacher instruction. Based on our concern with providing teachers a deep understanding of block-based programming, we present in the paper a study about teaching ScratchJr to pre-service teachers. It involved two groups, one trained with the materials developed by the ScratchJr creators and another one with materials that explain the run-time semantics of the different blocks of ScratchJr. The performance of both groups was compared with six questions extracted from the global exam of the course. The results show that pre-service teachers instructed with the novel approach performed better in predictive exercises or exercises focused on block understanding but performed worse in exercises consisting in translating a written behavior into scripts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用ScratchJr对职前幼儿教师进行程序设计概念培训的经验
ScratchJr是一种基于块的语言,适用于5至7岁的幼儿。该语言及其应用程序的开发采用了以学习者为中心的方法,使儿童能够使用和理解。显然,使用ScratchJr的幼儿教师必须发展对语言和编程基础的理解,作为他们内容知识的一部分。不幸的是,ScratchJr的建设者提供的材料并不是为教师发展而设想的,而是为教师指导而设想的。基于我们对教师深入理解基于块的编程的关注,我们在论文中提出了一项关于向职前教师教授ScratchJr的研究。它涉及两组,一组使用ScratchJr创建者开发的材料进行训练,另一组使用解释ScratchJr不同块的运行时语义的材料进行训练。将两组学生的表现与从该课程的全球考试中抽取的六个问题进行比较。结果表明,接受新方法指导的职前教师在预测性练习或专注于块理解的练习中表现更好,但在将书面行为转化为脚本的练习中表现较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Teachers’ Diagnostic and Intervention Skills in Debugging ”Roteco” - a Swiss teacher community for educational robotics Designing a Research Approach to Investigate Computer Science Student Teachers’ Beliefs on AI in School An Experience in Explicitly Training Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers in Programming Concepts with ScratchJr Video Analysis of a Teacher’s Use of Notional Machines in an Introductory High School Electronic Textile Unit: A three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1