Video Analysis of a Teacher’s Use of Notional Machines in an Introductory High School Electronic Textile Unit: A three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice

Gayithri Jayathirtha
{"title":"Video Analysis of a Teacher’s Use of Notional Machines in an Introductory High School Electronic Textile Unit: A three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice","authors":"Gayithri Jayathirtha","doi":"10.1145/3556787.3556798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learners’ conceptions of program dynamics shape their reading, writing, and debugging of code. But, the invisibility of underlying program behaviors that transform code to outcomes challenges learners. Teachers adopt notional machines, defined as simplified notions about program dynamics, to support learners within computing classrooms. Researchers have gathered notional machine examples by interviewing post-secondary instructors. But, there is a need to capture notional machines in practice within computing classrooms, particularly introductory high school classes where teachers communicate program dynamics to learners with limited to no prior programming experiences. Through a qualitative video analysis of seven online class periods (80 minutes each) across 14 weeks of an introductory physical computing electronic textiles high school unit, this paper answers: (1) What notional machines did the teacher use in practice? (2) At what levels of granularity did they communicate program dynamics? And, (3) What representational forms did they take? The analysis revealed a three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice. First, notional machines belonged to one of the five themes depending on the layer of abstraction simplified within electronic textiles. Second, they differed along the levels of granularity—individual atoms, program blocks, relations between blocks, or the entire program. Third, they took two distinct representational forms—verbal explanations and participatory roleplays. Overall, the analysis has two-fold contribution: provides a framework for future research to capture and study notional machines in practice, and, at the same time, presents one of the first accounts of notional machines adopted within a high school introductory physical computing unit.","PeriodicalId":136039,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3556787.3556798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learners’ conceptions of program dynamics shape their reading, writing, and debugging of code. But, the invisibility of underlying program behaviors that transform code to outcomes challenges learners. Teachers adopt notional machines, defined as simplified notions about program dynamics, to support learners within computing classrooms. Researchers have gathered notional machine examples by interviewing post-secondary instructors. But, there is a need to capture notional machines in practice within computing classrooms, particularly introductory high school classes where teachers communicate program dynamics to learners with limited to no prior programming experiences. Through a qualitative video analysis of seven online class periods (80 minutes each) across 14 weeks of an introductory physical computing electronic textiles high school unit, this paper answers: (1) What notional machines did the teacher use in practice? (2) At what levels of granularity did they communicate program dynamics? And, (3) What representational forms did they take? The analysis revealed a three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice. First, notional machines belonged to one of the five themes depending on the layer of abstraction simplified within electronic textiles. Second, they differed along the levels of granularity—individual atoms, program blocks, relations between blocks, or the entire program. Third, they took two distinct representational forms—verbal explanations and participatory roleplays. Overall, the analysis has two-fold contribution: provides a framework for future research to capture and study notional machines in practice, and, at the same time, presents one of the first accounts of notional machines adopted within a high school introductory physical computing unit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一位教师在高中电子纺织入门单元中使用概念机器的视频分析:在实践中捕捉概念机器的三层框架
学习者对程序动态的概念塑造了他们对代码的阅读、编写和调试。但是,将代码转化为结果的潜在程序行为的不可见性对学习者构成了挑战。教师采用概念机器,定义为关于程序动态的简化概念,以支持计算机教室中的学习者。研究人员通过采访大专教师收集了假想的机器例子。但是,有必要在计算机课堂的实践中捕捉概念机器,特别是在高中入门课程中,教师向有限或没有先前编程经验的学习者交流程序动态。本文通过对高中物理计算电子纺织入门单元为期14周的7节在线课(每节80分钟)的定性视频分析,回答了:(1)教师在实践中使用了哪些概念机器?(2)他们在什么粒度级别上交流程序动态?(3)它们采取了什么表征形式?分析揭示了在实践中捕捉概念机器的三层框架。首先,根据电子纺织品中简化的抽象层,概念机器属于五个主题之一。其次,它们在粒度级别(单个原子、程序块、块之间的关系或整个程序)上有所不同。第三,他们采取了两种截然不同的代表形式——口头解释和参与性角色扮演。总的来说,该分析有两方面的贡献:为未来的研究提供了一个框架,以便在实践中捕捉和研究概念机器,同时,在高中介绍性物理计算单元中提出了概念机器的第一个说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Teachers’ Diagnostic and Intervention Skills in Debugging ”Roteco” - a Swiss teacher community for educational robotics Designing a Research Approach to Investigate Computer Science Student Teachers’ Beliefs on AI in School An Experience in Explicitly Training Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers in Programming Concepts with ScratchJr Video Analysis of a Teacher’s Use of Notional Machines in an Introductory High School Electronic Textile Unit: A three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1