Non Iterative Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference between Two Proportions

J. Reed
{"title":"Non Iterative Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference between Two Proportions","authors":"J. Reed","doi":"10.5580/22e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of a confidence interval for the difference between two independent proportions is one of the most basic analyses in statistical inference. The Wald asymptotic methods, with and without a continuity correction have less than nominal coverage probability characteristics but continue to be used in spite of this known poor behavior. For the equal sample size case, the Wald-z coverage probability is subnominal overall. The Wald-c coverage probability always exceeds the nominal level and has interval width larger than Wald-z. For the unequal sample size case, Wald-z is always subnominal while Wald-c exceeds the nominal level. Newcombe's hybrid method and the Agresti-Caffo methods have coverage probabilities that are near nominal for either the equal or unequal sample sizes. Considering the coverage probability criterion, Newcombe's hybrid method and Agresti-Caffo method demonstrate superior coverage properties.","PeriodicalId":247354,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/22e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The construction of a confidence interval for the difference between two independent proportions is one of the most basic analyses in statistical inference. The Wald asymptotic methods, with and without a continuity correction have less than nominal coverage probability characteristics but continue to be used in spite of this known poor behavior. For the equal sample size case, the Wald-z coverage probability is subnominal overall. The Wald-c coverage probability always exceeds the nominal level and has interval width larger than Wald-z. For the unequal sample size case, Wald-z is always subnominal while Wald-c exceeds the nominal level. Newcombe's hybrid method and the Agresti-Caffo methods have coverage probabilities that are near nominal for either the equal or unequal sample sizes. Considering the coverage probability criterion, Newcombe's hybrid method and Agresti-Caffo method demonstrate superior coverage properties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两比例之差的非迭代置信区间方法
两个独立比例之差的置信区间的构造是统计推断中最基本的分析之一。有或没有连续性校正的Wald渐近方法的覆盖概率特征小于标称,但尽管这种已知的不良行为,仍继续使用。对于相同样本量的情况,Wald-z覆盖概率总体上是次名义的。Wald-c覆盖概率总是超过标称水平,且区间宽度大于Wald-z。对于不相等样本量的情况,Wald-z总是亚标称水平,而Wald-c则超过标称水平。纽科姆的混合方法和Agresti-Caffo方法对于相同或不相同样本量的覆盖概率接近名义。考虑到覆盖概率标准,纽科姆混合方法和Agresti-Caffo方法表现出更优的覆盖性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Participation Rates In Epidemiology Studies And Surveys: A Review 2007–2015 Population Migration Through Railroads And Spatial Diffusion Of Polio In India: A Cross-Sectional Pr Adjusting Structural Equation Modelling Of Spiritual Coping Scale: Use Of The Sattora-Bentler Method As An Alternative To Maximum Likelihood Estimation An Approach to Comparing Nations for Inclusion of Studies in Health-based Systematic Literature Reviews Perspectives, Constructs And Methods In The Measurement Of Multimorbidity And Comorbidity: A Critical Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1