Recensement et organisation civique à Ptolémaïs en Haute-Égypte à la fin du Ier s. ap. J.-C. Réflexions à propos de la provenance des données du P. Oxy. VI, 984

M. Vallet
{"title":"Recensement et organisation civique à Ptolémaïs en Haute-Égypte à la fin du Ier s. ap. J.-C. Réflexions à propos de la provenance des données du P. Oxy. VI, 984","authors":"M. Vallet","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The census register P. Oxy. 984 became controversial among scholars since its first publication by R. S. Bagnall, B. W. Frier and I. C. Rutherford in 1997. The main problem that scholars had to face was the location of residence of the declarants who sent their census declaration – preserved in this roll – to the fiscal administration of Upper Egypt. R. S. Bagnall, B. W. Frier and I. C. Rutherford suggested the Greek city of Ptolemais in Upper Egypt as the place from where the census declarations had been gathered. On the contrary, O. Montevecchi and some of her students tried to demonstrate that the declarations comprised in the roll came from Lykopolis and not Ptolemais in Upper Egypt. The reopening of this debate is guided by a particular attention drew to onomastic, toponymic and institutional data gathered in the roll in a comparative perspective with data found in the corpus of Ptolemais. The questions raised by the papyrus do not only concern location issue, but also deal with the meaning of the term προξένοι βουλευτῶν, and even with the purpose of this census compilation.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The census register P. Oxy. 984 became controversial among scholars since its first publication by R. S. Bagnall, B. W. Frier and I. C. Rutherford in 1997. The main problem that scholars had to face was the location of residence of the declarants who sent their census declaration – preserved in this roll – to the fiscal administration of Upper Egypt. R. S. Bagnall, B. W. Frier and I. C. Rutherford suggested the Greek city of Ptolemais in Upper Egypt as the place from where the census declarations had been gathered. On the contrary, O. Montevecchi and some of her students tried to demonstrate that the declarations comprised in the roll came from Lykopolis and not Ptolemais in Upper Egypt. The reopening of this debate is guided by a particular attention drew to onomastic, toponymic and institutional data gathered in the roll in a comparative perspective with data found in the corpus of Ptolemais. The questions raised by the papyrus do not only concern location issue, but also deal with the meaning of the term προξένοι βουλευτῶν, and even with the purpose of this census compilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公元1世纪末上埃及托勒密的人口普查和公民组织关于P. Oxy数据来源的思考。六、984
人口普查登记簿P. Oxy. 984自1997年由r.s. Bagnall, b.w. Frier和i.c. Rutherford首次出版以来,在学者中引起了争议。学者们必须面对的主要问题是,向上埃及的财政管理部门发送人口普查申报(保存在这份卷宗中)的申报者的居住地。R. S. Bagnall, B. W. Frier和I. C. Rutherford建议上埃及的希腊城市托勒密(Ptolemais)作为收集人口普查声明的地方。相反,O. Montevecchi和她的一些学生试图证明卷中的宣言来自Lykopolis,而不是上埃及的托勒密。重新开始这一辩论的指导是,特别关注从托勒密语料库中发现的数据的比较角度收集到的名称、地名和机构数据。提出的问题纸莎草不仅关注位置问题,而且处理这个词的意思是προξένοιβουλευτῶν,甚至与这次普查的目的编译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virgile en Orient : formes et circulation de l’Énéide dans la Pars Orientis de l’Empire (Ier-VIe siècles) Paratextual readings of imperial discourse in the Res Gestae divi Augusti La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome L’appellation Caesaris (Uxor) dans les témoignages épigraphiques et littéraires sur Scribonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1