Thermo-Mechanical Reworkable Epoxy Underfill in Board-Level Package: Material Characteristics and Reliability Criteria

Saw Lip Teng, M. Devarajan
{"title":"Thermo-Mechanical Reworkable Epoxy Underfill in Board-Level Package: Material Characteristics and Reliability Criteria","authors":"Saw Lip Teng, M. Devarajan","doi":"10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work explores underfill with improved properties for rework-ability and package reliability. Reworkable underfills (Epoxy-R1 – R5) were customized by a material supplier and benchmarked with an existing non-reworkable underfill (Epoxy-E). R1 shows similar glass transition temperature (Tg), coefficient of thermal expansion 1&2 (CTE) with Epoxy-E, lower storage modulus (30% of Epoxy-E), yet still poor for rework due to major damage on printed circuit board (PCB) detected. R2 was refined with much lower modulus, 10% of Epoxy-E, but failed to meet target Tg and CTE. R3 used smaller filler size (10um) in formulation, reliability related properties were significantly improved, however, same overheat issue on adjacent component and insufficient coverage was found. For R4 and R5, both Tg reached above 130°C and low CTE-2 around 100ppm/°C, which is only 70% of Epoxy-E. For rework evaluation, R4 and R5 showed good results, no adjacent defects which are suspected due to lower adhesion, underfill is easier to remove. R5 was selected for reliability test due to its similarity in viscosity and process condition compared to Epoxy-E with minimal change in dispensing process setup. R5 test vehicle survived 1000 thermal cycling (-40°C to 85°C) meeting mechanical shock and vibration tests qualification. Lastly, it was observed that R5 achieved both rework-ability and package reliability expectations with a new defined thermo-mechanical property.","PeriodicalId":139520,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This work explores underfill with improved properties for rework-ability and package reliability. Reworkable underfills (Epoxy-R1 – R5) were customized by a material supplier and benchmarked with an existing non-reworkable underfill (Epoxy-E). R1 shows similar glass transition temperature (Tg), coefficient of thermal expansion 1&2 (CTE) with Epoxy-E, lower storage modulus (30% of Epoxy-E), yet still poor for rework due to major damage on printed circuit board (PCB) detected. R2 was refined with much lower modulus, 10% of Epoxy-E, but failed to meet target Tg and CTE. R3 used smaller filler size (10um) in formulation, reliability related properties were significantly improved, however, same overheat issue on adjacent component and insufficient coverage was found. For R4 and R5, both Tg reached above 130°C and low CTE-2 around 100ppm/°C, which is only 70% of Epoxy-E. For rework evaluation, R4 and R5 showed good results, no adjacent defects which are suspected due to lower adhesion, underfill is easier to remove. R5 was selected for reliability test due to its similarity in viscosity and process condition compared to Epoxy-E with minimal change in dispensing process setup. R5 test vehicle survived 1000 thermal cycling (-40°C to 85°C) meeting mechanical shock and vibration tests qualification. Lastly, it was observed that R5 achieved both rework-ability and package reliability expectations with a new defined thermo-mechanical property.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
板级包装中的热机械可再加工环氧底料:材料特性和可靠性标准
这项工作探索了具有改进的再加工能力和包装可靠性的下填料。可返修底填料(环氧- r1 - R5)由材料供应商定制,并与现有不可返修底填料(环氧- e)进行基准测试。R1显示出与环氧树脂相似的玻璃化转变温度(Tg),热膨胀系数1和2 (CTE),存储模量较低(环氧树脂的30%),但由于检测到印刷电路板(PCB)的严重损坏,返工能力仍然很差。R2的模量要低得多,为环氧树脂- e的10%,但未能达到目标Tg和CTE。R3在配方中使用较小的填料尺寸(10um),可靠性相关性能显着提高,但在相邻组件上发现了相同的过热问题和覆盖不足。对于R4和R5, Tg均达到130℃以上,CTE-2低至100ppm/℃左右,仅为环氧树脂e的70%。对于返工评价,R4和R5效果较好,无相邻缺陷,粘结力较低,下填料较易去除。由于R5在粘度和工艺条件上与环氧树脂- e相似,且点胶工艺设置变化最小,因此选择R5进行可靠性测试。R5测试车在1000次热循环(-40°C至85°C)中存活,满足机械冲击和振动测试资格。最后,观察到R5在新的定义的热机械性能下实现了返工性和封装可靠性的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transient Thermal Modeling of Die Bond Process in Multiple Die Stacked Flash Memory Package Development and Application of the Moisture-Dependent Viscoelastic Model of Polyimide in Hygro-Thermo-Mechanical Analysis of Fan-Out Interconnect Superb sinterability of the Cu paste consisting of bimodal size distribution Cu nanoparticles for low-temperature and pressureless sintering of large-area die attachment and the sintering mechanism Demonstration of Substrate Embedded Ni-Zn Ferrite Core Solenoid Inductors Using a Photosensitive Glass Substrate A De-Embedding and Embedding Procedure for High-Speed Channel Eye Diagram Oscilloscope Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1