The Effectiveness of Remdesivir versus Ruxolitinib as Covid-19 Supportive Management: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis

Nuriyatul Fhatonah, Ma’sum, Zenith Putri Dewianti, Nur’aini, N. Rusdiana
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Remdesivir versus Ruxolitinib as Covid-19 Supportive Management: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis","authors":"Nuriyatul Fhatonah, Ma’sum, Zenith Putri Dewianti, Nur’aini, N. Rusdiana","doi":"10.2991/AHSR.K.210115.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The treatment regimen in severe Covid-19 patients has several types of therapies. However, there is uncertainty about which therapies are more effective in the covid-19 weight category. In June 2020, the study was conducted with keyword search [REMDESIVIR] [RUXOLITINIB] [COVID19] in 2010-2020 using PUBMED.gov. This study used rct (randomization controller trial) method with the theme: the comparison of the effectiveness use of Remdesivir with Ruxolitinib on Covid-19. From the results of the analysis using forest plot obtained, there was a significant difference in the administration of Remdesivir therapy with Ruxolitinib on the improvement from covid-19 on day 7 (1.26 CI 95% 0.41 to 3.86) and day 14 (RR 1.26 CI 95% 0.41 to 3.86). Ruxolitinib therapy is more effective than Remdesivir applied for Covid-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":222657,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Health Science and Nursing (ICoSIHSN 2020)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Health Science and Nursing (ICoSIHSN 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AHSR.K.210115.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The treatment regimen in severe Covid-19 patients has several types of therapies. However, there is uncertainty about which therapies are more effective in the covid-19 weight category. In June 2020, the study was conducted with keyword search [REMDESIVIR] [RUXOLITINIB] [COVID19] in 2010-2020 using PUBMED.gov. This study used rct (randomization controller trial) method with the theme: the comparison of the effectiveness use of Remdesivir with Ruxolitinib on Covid-19. From the results of the analysis using forest plot obtained, there was a significant difference in the administration of Remdesivir therapy with Ruxolitinib on the improvement from covid-19 on day 7 (1.26 CI 95% 0.41 to 3.86) and day 14 (RR 1.26 CI 95% 0.41 to 3.86). Ruxolitinib therapy is more effective than Remdesivir applied for Covid-19 patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞德西韦与鲁索利替尼作为Covid-19支持性管理的有效性:系统评价、meta分析
Covid-19重症患者的治疗方案有几种类型的疗法。然而,哪种疗法在covid-19体重类别中更有效尚不确定。该研究于2020年6月在PUBMED.gov上检索2010-2020年关键词[REMDESIVIR] [RUXOLITINIB] [covid - 19]进行。本研究采用rct(随机对照试验)方法,主题为:比较Remdesivir与Ruxolitinib治疗Covid-19的疗效。从获得的森林图分析结果来看,在第7天(1.26 CI 95% 0.41 ~ 3.86)和第14天(RR 1.26 CI 95% 0.41 ~ 3.86),瑞德西韦联合鲁索利替尼治疗对covid-19的改善有显著差异。鲁索利替尼治疗新冠肺炎的效果优于瑞德西韦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extract on Mean Platelet Volume and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Autoimmune Patients Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Hs-CRP Predict Mortality in COVID-19 Patients The Effectiveness of Remdesivir versus Ruxolitinib as Covid-19 Supportive Management: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis Prospective Study: Study of Asthma Therapy and the Relationship Between Asthma Control Levels and Quality of Life of Asthma Patients Mental Emotional Disorders in the Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1