Comparative Analysis of The Cost of Conventional and Precast Concrete Slabs on High-Rise Building Projects

Diah Kurniawati Ningtyas, Arilia Regita Tri Cahyani, Z. R. Kamandang, Muh. Darul Muttaqin, Rizky Nur Cahyanto
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of The Cost of Conventional and Precast Concrete Slabs on High-Rise Building Projects","authors":"Diah Kurniawati Ningtyas, Arilia Regita Tri Cahyani, Z. R. Kamandang, Muh. Darul Muttaqin, Rizky Nur Cahyanto","doi":"10.33005/ci-tech.v3i2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nConstruction processes, particularly floor slab systems, can be executed using precast/precast methods as technology advances. Compared to traditional methods, which need more time and production expenses, precast/precast methods are more cost-effective for floor slab formwork, neater, and have a more consistent finish. This study is based on an eight-floor building project with 92 residential units on a 3,500 m2 plot of land and a 1,700 m2 building size. This investigation used two technologies: conventional precast slab and full slab precast. The purpose of this research is to compare the most cost-effective strategy for reducing production costs on floor slab work for the construction of the case study. Based on the calculation results, the full slab precast method is 14.31% or around Rp. 980,508,000 is more economical than the conventional method. For the conventional method, the total cost is Rp. 3,914,657,000 while for the precast method, the result is Rp. 2,934,149,000. \n","PeriodicalId":221750,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering Science and Technology (CI-TECH)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering Science and Technology (CI-TECH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33005/ci-tech.v3i2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Construction processes, particularly floor slab systems, can be executed using precast/precast methods as technology advances. Compared to traditional methods, which need more time and production expenses, precast/precast methods are more cost-effective for floor slab formwork, neater, and have a more consistent finish. This study is based on an eight-floor building project with 92 residential units on a 3,500 m2 plot of land and a 1,700 m2 building size. This investigation used two technologies: conventional precast slab and full slab precast. The purpose of this research is to compare the most cost-effective strategy for reducing production costs on floor slab work for the construction of the case study. Based on the calculation results, the full slab precast method is 14.31% or around Rp. 980,508,000 is more economical than the conventional method. For the conventional method, the total cost is Rp. 3,914,657,000 while for the precast method, the result is Rp. 2,934,149,000.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高层建筑工程中常规混凝土板与预制混凝土板造价的比较分析
随着技术的进步,建筑过程,特别是楼板系统,可以使用预制/预制方法来执行。与需要更多时间和生产费用的传统方法相比,预制/预制方法对楼板模板更具成本效益,更整洁,并且具有更一致的光洁度。本研究基于一个8层的建筑项目,该项目有92个住宅单元,地块面积为3500平方米,建筑面积为1700平方米。本研究采用两种技术:常规预制板和全板预制。本研究的目的是比较最具成本效益的策略,以降低楼板施工的生产成本为例进行研究。计算结果表明,全板坯预制法比常规方法节约14.31%,即980,508,000卢比左右。对于常规方法,总成本为Rp. 3,914,657,000,而对于预制方法,结果为Rp. 2,934,149,000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Road Performance Analysis Using PCE MC Value 0.17 on Rungkut Madya Road Comparative Analysis of The Cost of Conventional and Precast Concrete Slabs on High-Rise Building Projects The Effect of Increasing Vehicle Volume on Some Roads in Surabaya Post Pandemic Analysis Of Theissen Method With IDW Plotting In Kediri City The Effect of Ecentric Load on The Carrying Capacity Rectangular Foundation on Clay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1