The Advance of Film Tourism

S. Beeton
{"title":"The Advance of Film Tourism","authors":"S. Beeton","doi":"10.1080/14790530903522572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the development of tourism knowledge and research’s contribution is an important process that enables us to see where we are, have been and are going. The articles in this special edition of Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development come together to present a state-of-the-art outline of knowledge in the relatively recent field of film-induced tourism as well as furthering that knowledge. In Tribe’s commentary on the historic dominance of the business paradigm in tourism research, he notes that it is moving from “the narrow boundaries of an applied business field. . .[towards] a fledgling post-modern field of research” (Tribe, 2005, p. 5). The emerging field of film tourism research invites multi-disciplinary post-modern study, which has moved from simply considering business and marketing aspects towards approaches incorporating multiple disciplinary perspectives. In her paper in this edition, Angelina Karpovich frames this by examining the range of terms used to describe the various approaches to studying the relationship between film and tourism, arguing that such differences are primarily disciplinary based. This situation also reflects a lack of cross-disciplinary fertilization and collaboration—an issue I have also commented on elsewhere. One of the goals of this special edition is to bring together researchers from various disciplinary backgrounds under the banner of “planning and development” and facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what each discipline can bring to this field. Early work into film-induced tourism from the tourism discipline primarily focused on the numbers of people visiting the places featured in movies, aiming to provide evidence of the significance of this new field of study. Riley, Tooke, Baker and van Doren are generally acknowledged as the first to publish in this field (Riley and van Doren, 1992; Riley, 1994; Tooke and Baker, 1996; Riley, Baker and van Doren, 1998), however some speculative work was already being undertaken by researchers in other disciplines. This included an interesting paper by Kindem (1979) discussing the difficulties of predicting a film’s popularity through simply using factors such as economics, proposing that semiotics, ideology and psychology come into play. However, it has taken some time and a great deal of “grounding” work before Kindem’s approach has been realized, but can be seen emerging from this special edition. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development Vol. 7, No. 1, 1–6, February 2010","PeriodicalId":130558,"journal":{"name":"Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"109","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14790530903522572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 109

Abstract

Understanding the development of tourism knowledge and research’s contribution is an important process that enables us to see where we are, have been and are going. The articles in this special edition of Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development come together to present a state-of-the-art outline of knowledge in the relatively recent field of film-induced tourism as well as furthering that knowledge. In Tribe’s commentary on the historic dominance of the business paradigm in tourism research, he notes that it is moving from “the narrow boundaries of an applied business field. . .[towards] a fledgling post-modern field of research” (Tribe, 2005, p. 5). The emerging field of film tourism research invites multi-disciplinary post-modern study, which has moved from simply considering business and marketing aspects towards approaches incorporating multiple disciplinary perspectives. In her paper in this edition, Angelina Karpovich frames this by examining the range of terms used to describe the various approaches to studying the relationship between film and tourism, arguing that such differences are primarily disciplinary based. This situation also reflects a lack of cross-disciplinary fertilization and collaboration—an issue I have also commented on elsewhere. One of the goals of this special edition is to bring together researchers from various disciplinary backgrounds under the banner of “planning and development” and facilitate a more inclusive understanding of what each discipline can bring to this field. Early work into film-induced tourism from the tourism discipline primarily focused on the numbers of people visiting the places featured in movies, aiming to provide evidence of the significance of this new field of study. Riley, Tooke, Baker and van Doren are generally acknowledged as the first to publish in this field (Riley and van Doren, 1992; Riley, 1994; Tooke and Baker, 1996; Riley, Baker and van Doren, 1998), however some speculative work was already being undertaken by researchers in other disciplines. This included an interesting paper by Kindem (1979) discussing the difficulties of predicting a film’s popularity through simply using factors such as economics, proposing that semiotics, ideology and psychology come into play. However, it has taken some time and a great deal of “grounding” work before Kindem’s approach has been realized, but can be seen emerging from this special edition. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development Vol. 7, No. 1, 1–6, February 2010
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电影旅游的发展
了解旅游知识的发展和研究的贡献是一个重要的过程,使我们能够看到我们在哪里,曾经和正在去。本期《旅游与酒店规划与发展》特别版的文章汇集在一起,介绍了相对较新的电影诱导旅游领域的最新知识大纲,并进一步介绍了这些知识。在Tribe对旅游研究中商业范式的历史主导地位的评论中,他指出,它正在从“应用商业领域的狭窄边界……[向]一个新兴的后现代研究领域发展”(Tribe, 2005,第5页)。电影旅游研究的新兴领域邀请了多学科的后现代研究,它已经从简单地考虑商业和营销方面转向结合多学科视角的方法。在本期的论文中,安吉丽娜·卡波维奇(Angelina Karpovich)通过研究用于描述研究电影与旅游业之间关系的各种方法的术语范围,提出了这种差异主要是基于学科的。这种情况也反映了跨学科交流和合作的缺乏——我在其他地方也评论过这个问题。本期特别版的目标之一是将来自不同学科背景的研究人员聚集在“规划与发展”的旗帜下,并促进对每个学科可以为该领域带来什么的更包容的理解。旅游学科对电影诱导旅游的早期研究主要集中在参观电影中出现的地方的人数上,旨在为这一新的研究领域的意义提供证据。Riley、Tooke、Baker和van Doren被普遍认为是第一批在这一领域发表文章的人(Riley和van Doren, 1992;莱利,1994;Tooke and Baker, 1996;Riley, Baker和van Doren, 1998),然而,其他学科的研究人员已经在进行一些推测性的工作。其中包括Kindem(1979)的一篇有趣的论文,讨论了通过简单地使用经济学等因素来预测电影受欢迎程度的困难,提出符号学,意识形态和心理学发挥作用。然而,在Kindem的方法实现之前,它花了一些时间和大量的“基础”工作,但可以从这个特别版中看到。《旅游与酒店规划与发展》第七卷,第1 - 6期,2010年2月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is it Feasible? Positioning Feasibility Analysis as a Valuable Tool For Assessing a Potential Tourism Development Urban Tourism Districts: A Taxonomy and a Study of a New Proposed Type Management Development Skills in the Hospitality and Tourism Sector: Needs and Issues from a Regional Perspective Contributors Developing Effective Strategies for Tackling Seasonality in the Tourism Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1