A comparison between the ANSI/IEEE and the CENELEC/IEC approach to overload protection of insulated power cables

G. Parise, G. Rubino
{"title":"A comparison between the ANSI/IEEE and the CENELEC/IEC approach to overload protection of insulated power cables","authors":"G. Parise, G. Rubino","doi":"10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The same basic principles on which the methods of power cable protection against overloads are based are summed up by different criteria and formulations within ANSI/IEEE and CENELEC/TEC publications. The studies carried out by the technical committees of these organizations have been examined and compared, in order to point out not only their differences, but also their complementary aspects. By combining the two approaches, it has been possible to outline a \"third way\" to determine the admissible duration of overload currents and define intermediate criteria for the emergency ratings of cables and for the coordination of protective devices.","PeriodicalId":138670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference","volume":"30 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The same basic principles on which the methods of power cable protection against overloads are based are summed up by different criteria and formulations within ANSI/IEEE and CENELEC/TEC publications. The studies carried out by the technical committees of these organizations have been examined and compared, in order to point out not only their differences, but also their complementary aspects. By combining the two approaches, it has been possible to outline a "third way" to determine the admissible duration of overload currents and define intermediate criteria for the emergency ratings of cables and for the coordination of protective devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANSI/IEEE和CENELEC/IEC绝缘电力电缆过载保护方法的比较
在ANSI/IEEE和CENELEC/TEC出版物中,不同的标准和公式总结了电力电缆过载保护方法所基于的相同基本原则。对这些组织的技术委员会所进行的研究进行了审查和比较,以便不仅指出它们之间的差异,而且指出它们之间的互补方面。将这两种方法结合起来,就有可能概述出"第三种方法",以确定过载电流的允许持续时间,并为电缆的紧急额定值和保护装置的协调确定中间标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new method for both harmonic voltage and harmonic current suppression and power factor correction in industrial power systems Applications of EMTP for transient stability study of an islanded industrial power system Minimizing the effects of voltage disturbances on continuous industrial processes Comparison between different procedures of reliability analysis for emergency and stand-by power systems A comparison between the ANSI/IEEE and the CENELEC/IEC approach to overload protection of insulated power cables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1