Predicting Flight Training Performance From the Tabular Speed Test

D. Damos, A. Bittner, Mary Niemczyk
{"title":"Predicting Flight Training Performance From the Tabular Speed Test","authors":"D. Damos, A. Bittner, Mary Niemczyk","doi":"10.1027/2192-0923/a000228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study determined the predictive validity for the number correct (COR) and the number wrong (WR) of a complex perceptual speed test at three milestones in a collegiate flight training program. Test–retest data were obtained at different intervals. COR predicted time to solo ( N = 119, r = −.15, p < .05) and time to the private pilot certificate ( N = 51, r = −.34, p < .01). WR did not correlate with any performance measure. Test–retest reliabilities averaged across 17 months were r = .604 for COR and r = .431 for WR, with p < .0001 for both. A factor analysis of the test–retest data demonstrated that WR and COR loaded on different factors, indicating that they assess different attributes.","PeriodicalId":121896,"journal":{"name":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This study determined the predictive validity for the number correct (COR) and the number wrong (WR) of a complex perceptual speed test at three milestones in a collegiate flight training program. Test–retest data were obtained at different intervals. COR predicted time to solo ( N = 119, r = −.15, p < .05) and time to the private pilot certificate ( N = 51, r = −.34, p < .01). WR did not correlate with any performance measure. Test–retest reliabilities averaged across 17 months were r = .604 for COR and r = .431 for WR, with p < .0001 for both. A factor analysis of the test–retest data demonstrated that WR and COR loaded on different factors, indicating that they assess different attributes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从表速度试验预测飞行训练性能
摘要本研究确定了在大学飞行训练计划的三个里程碑的复杂知觉速度测试的正确数(COR)和错误数(WR)的预测效度。以不同的间隔获得测试-重测试数据。COR预测独奏时间(N = 119, r =−)。15, p < 0.05)和时间对私人飞行员证书的影响(N = 51, r =−。34, p < 0.01)。WR与任何绩效指标都没有相关性。17个月的平均重测信度,COR为r = 0.604, WR为r = 0.431,两者的p < 0.0001。对重测数据的因子分析表明,WR和COR在不同的因子上负载,表明它们评估不同的属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactions With Technology in the Cockpit Measuring Presence and Situational Awareness in a Virtual Reality Flight Simulator The Effectiveness of Improving Flight Passengers’ Safety Behaviors by Modifying Auditory Cues Eye-Tracking Crucial Abilities of Pilots and Weapon Systems Officers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1