THE EFFECT OF AUDITOR COMPETENCE, PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, RED FLAG, AND INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM ON FRAUD DETECTION

Kenneth Gunawan, Muhammad Fauzan Riyanal, B. Handoko
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF AUDITOR COMPETENCE, PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, RED FLAG, AND INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM ON FRAUD DETECTION","authors":"Kenneth Gunawan, Muhammad Fauzan Riyanal, B. Handoko","doi":"10.21512/jafa.v9i2.8972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today more and more cases of fraud occur. In each of these cases, there is always an auditor's failure to detect fraud. It makes the fraud going on for a long time before being discovered. Based on this, we intend to research the factors influencing fraud detection. This study aims to determine the effect of auditor competence, professional skepticism, red flags, and internal control systems on fraud detection. The data collection technique in this study used primary data by distributing questionnaires to auditors working at the Public Accounting Firm (KAP) in the DKI Jakarta area using a purposive sampling method. The data analysis method uses a partial least square model using the SmartPLS 3.3 software. The results of this study indicate that auditor competence, red flag, and internal control system variables significantly affect fraud detection. In contrast, the professional skepticism variable has no significant effect on fraud detection.","PeriodicalId":151258,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/jafa.v9i2.8972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Today more and more cases of fraud occur. In each of these cases, there is always an auditor's failure to detect fraud. It makes the fraud going on for a long time before being discovered. Based on this, we intend to research the factors influencing fraud detection. This study aims to determine the effect of auditor competence, professional skepticism, red flags, and internal control systems on fraud detection. The data collection technique in this study used primary data by distributing questionnaires to auditors working at the Public Accounting Firm (KAP) in the DKI Jakarta area using a purposive sampling method. The data analysis method uses a partial least square model using the SmartPLS 3.3 software. The results of this study indicate that auditor competence, red flag, and internal control system variables significantly affect fraud detection. In contrast, the professional skepticism variable has no significant effect on fraud detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计师能力、职业怀疑、危险信号和内部控制制度对舞弊侦查的影响
如今,诈骗案件越来越多。在每一种情况下,总有审计师未能发现欺诈。这使得欺诈行为持续了很长时间才被发现。基于此,我们打算研究影响欺诈检测的因素。本研究旨在确定审计师能力、专业怀疑、危险信号和内部控制系统对欺诈检测的影响。本研究中的数据收集技术使用了主要数据,通过使用有目的的抽样方法向在DKI雅加达地区的公共会计师事务所(KAP)工作的审计师分发问卷。数据分析方法采用偏最小二乘模型,采用SmartPLS 3.3软件。本研究结果表明,审计师能力、危险信号和内部控制制度变量显著影响舞弊检测。相反,职业怀疑变量对欺诈检测没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DID GOLD, BITCOIN AND FOREX AS SAFE HAVEN ASSET FOR SOUTH EAST ASIA INDEX DURING COVID 19 DETERMINANTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, FIRM SIZE, PROFITABILITY, AND LEVERAGE ON EARNING QUALITY THE EFFECT OF COMPENSATION SCHEMES, OBEDIENCE PRESSURE, AND SELF-EFFICACY ON BUDGETARY SLACK THE EFFECT OF AUDITOR COMPETENCE, PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, RED FLAG, AND INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM ON FRAUD DETECTION INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MONETARY POLICY UNCERATAINTY INDEX OF US AND THE DOLLAR INDEX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1