Pengapusan Hak Veto Dalam Rangka Reformasi Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa

Dewi Afrilianti, Budi Ardianto, Dony Yusra Pebrianto
{"title":"Pengapusan Hak Veto Dalam Rangka Reformasi Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa","authors":"Dewi Afrilianti, Budi Ardianto, Dony Yusra Pebrianto","doi":"10.22437/UP.V2I2.12114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out what is the reason the veto is considered irrelevant to the Security Council in realizing world security and peace in connection with the plan of veto power in the framework of reform of the United Nations Security Council because the use of veto rights by the five permanent member states of the Security Council, especially the United States has been used with no limits. The research method used is normative type with statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study show that the security council's veto power in practice has deviated from its original intent. The reform efforts of the United Nations Security Council have many obstacles but the main obstacles that greatly hinder the reform efforts are the arrogant, selfish, and willless nature of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council who are veto holders to continue to maintain their hegemony and national interests. \nKeywords:  United Nations; Right; Veto;","PeriodicalId":336517,"journal":{"name":"Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/UP.V2I2.12114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find out what is the reason the veto is considered irrelevant to the Security Council in realizing world security and peace in connection with the plan of veto power in the framework of reform of the United Nations Security Council because the use of veto rights by the five permanent member states of the Security Council, especially the United States has been used with no limits. The research method used is normative type with statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study show that the security council's veto power in practice has deviated from its original intent. The reform efforts of the United Nations Security Council have many obstacles but the main obstacles that greatly hinder the reform efforts are the arrogant, selfish, and willless nature of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council who are veto holders to continue to maintain their hegemony and national interests. Keywords:  United Nations; Right; Veto;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为了联合国安理会的改革,取消否决权
本研究旨在结合联合国安理会改革框架下的否决权计划,找出否决权在实现世界安全与和平方面被认为与安理会无关的原因是什么,因为安理会五个常任理事国,特别是美国的否决权的使用一直没有限制。使用的研究方法是规范性的,包括成文法、概念法和案例法。这项研究的结果表明,安全理事会的否决权实际上已经偏离了其最初的意图。联合国安理会的改革努力有许多障碍,但极大阻碍改革努力的主要障碍是联合国安理会常任理事国的傲慢、自私和任性,它们拥有否决权,继续维护自己的霸权和国家利益。关键词:联合国;对的;否决;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Indonesia and Thailand Transform International Law: A Study of Access and Benefit Sharing The Lion Air JT610 Crash Due to Lack of Pilot Training: Is There Responsibility for Indonesia? Application of The Principles of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Towards Personal Data Breach Committed Cross-Country Borders Protecting Indonesia's Communal Intellectual Property Rights: A TWAIL Perspective Mitigating Disinformation: Reflection of #NoNotAgain Campaign in Nepal for Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1