How Indonesia and Thailand Transform International Law: A Study of Access and Benefit Sharing

Retno Kusniati
{"title":"How Indonesia and Thailand Transform International Law: A Study of Access and Benefit Sharing","authors":"Retno Kusniati","doi":"10.22437/up.v5i2.36003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the transformation of international law, The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (NP), into national law. Those convention and protocol have established an Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) system between utilizers and providers of genetic resources, including for indigenous people. One of the objectives of treaties it to obligate States to make law to ensure the rights of indigenous people for benefit sharing. Indonesia and Thailand are megadiversity countries and also the parties of the treaties. This paper tries to compare Indonesia and Thailand in transforming the ABS law into their national legal system and how the judges in Indonesia and Thailand use international treaty in deciding the cases. CBD is the starting point of the ABS concept for legal rights or interests that can be owned in relation to genetic resources. In this sense ABS is one of the new and innovative legal concepts introduced in international law. However, the CBD has only created a concept of ABS rights policy. Therefore, the concept of ABS rights of indigenous peoples needs to be formulated in national law by enacted the rights of indigenous peoples related to genetic resources.","PeriodicalId":336517,"journal":{"name":"Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v5i2.36003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the transformation of international law, The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (NP), into national law. Those convention and protocol have established an Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) system between utilizers and providers of genetic resources, including for indigenous people. One of the objectives of treaties it to obligate States to make law to ensure the rights of indigenous people for benefit sharing. Indonesia and Thailand are megadiversity countries and also the parties of the treaties. This paper tries to compare Indonesia and Thailand in transforming the ABS law into their national legal system and how the judges in Indonesia and Thailand use international treaty in deciding the cases. CBD is the starting point of the ABS concept for legal rights or interests that can be owned in relation to genetic resources. In this sense ABS is one of the new and innovative legal concepts introduced in international law. However, the CBD has only created a concept of ABS rights policy. Therefore, the concept of ABS rights of indigenous peoples needs to be formulated in national law by enacted the rights of indigenous peoples related to genetic resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚和泰国如何改变国际法:获取和惠益分享研究
本文论述了将《生物多样性公约》(CBD)及其《关于获取和惠益分享的名古屋议定书》(NP)这一国际法转化为国内法的问题。这些公约和议定书在遗传资源的利用者和提供者(包括土著人民)之间建立了获取和惠益分享(ABS)制度。条约的目标之一是责成各国制定法律,确保土著人民的利益分享权。印度尼西亚和泰国是巨型多样性国家,也是条约的缔约国。本文试图比较印度尼西亚和泰国在将获取和惠益分享法纳入其国家法律体系方面的情况,以及印度尼西亚和泰国的法官在裁决案件时如何使用国际条约。生物多样性公约》是获取和惠益分享概念的起点,即与遗传资源有关的合法权利或利益。从这个意义上说,获取和惠益分享是国际法中引入的新的创新法律概念之一。然而,《生物多样性公约》只是创立了获取和惠益分享权利政策的概念。因此,需要在国家法律中制定土著人民获取和惠益分享权利的概念,颁布土著人民与遗传资源有关的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Indonesia and Thailand Transform International Law: A Study of Access and Benefit Sharing The Lion Air JT610 Crash Due to Lack of Pilot Training: Is There Responsibility for Indonesia? Application of The Principles of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Towards Personal Data Breach Committed Cross-Country Borders Protecting Indonesia's Communal Intellectual Property Rights: A TWAIL Perspective Mitigating Disinformation: Reflection of #NoNotAgain Campaign in Nepal for Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1