Current and future manufacturing test solution strategies - iNEMI Boundary-scan and Built in Self Test (BIST) technology integration for future standardization

Z. Conroy, J. Balangue, P. B. Geiger, S. Butkovich
{"title":"Current and future manufacturing test solution strategies - iNEMI Boundary-scan and Built in Self Test (BIST) technology integration for future standardization","authors":"Z. Conroy, J. Balangue, P. B. Geiger, S. Butkovich","doi":"10.1109/IEMT.2012.6521823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Product cost and revenue trends are not consistent with the cost of Test, Inspection and Measurement (TIM) technologies. Specifically, while Moore's Law has applied to the silicon in the product, it does not apply to the overall cost of test of the resulting higher-functionality, desirably lower-cost product. Higher performance and lower cost test equipment, while also desirable, are not enough to solve the gap between the cost of increasing requirements for test/inspection coverage and price that customers are willing to pay for the product. Product design solutions (testability features) that facilitate lower cost test solutions while keeping adequate test coverage, must be explored. Test methodology and strategy need to be reconsidered. Increasing product complexity and reduced test point access are driving a desire to increase use of technologies such as Boundary-Scan and BIST (Built-In-Self-Test) to improve test coverage. The International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI) has two ongoing projects investigating the gaps and ultimately driving for industry changes in the deployment of those technologies. This paper presents the results from those two projects. The first portion of the paper introduces the outputs from the iNEMI Boundary-scan project team, which reviewed current available test methods and strategy for testing the external memory devices and analyzed the gaps and opportunities. The second portion of the paper discusses the opportunity of BIST technology for board level testing and the needs for standardization. The two projects clarify the requirements needed for the existing boundary-scan IEEE1149.1 standard and other industry standards to bridge the gap for lack of test point access and improved testability of products.","PeriodicalId":315408,"journal":{"name":"2012 35th IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Conference (IEMT)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 35th IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Conference (IEMT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMT.2012.6521823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Product cost and revenue trends are not consistent with the cost of Test, Inspection and Measurement (TIM) technologies. Specifically, while Moore's Law has applied to the silicon in the product, it does not apply to the overall cost of test of the resulting higher-functionality, desirably lower-cost product. Higher performance and lower cost test equipment, while also desirable, are not enough to solve the gap between the cost of increasing requirements for test/inspection coverage and price that customers are willing to pay for the product. Product design solutions (testability features) that facilitate lower cost test solutions while keeping adequate test coverage, must be explored. Test methodology and strategy need to be reconsidered. Increasing product complexity and reduced test point access are driving a desire to increase use of technologies such as Boundary-Scan and BIST (Built-In-Self-Test) to improve test coverage. The International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI) has two ongoing projects investigating the gaps and ultimately driving for industry changes in the deployment of those technologies. This paper presents the results from those two projects. The first portion of the paper introduces the outputs from the iNEMI Boundary-scan project team, which reviewed current available test methods and strategy for testing the external memory devices and analyzed the gaps and opportunities. The second portion of the paper discusses the opportunity of BIST technology for board level testing and the needs for standardization. The two projects clarify the requirements needed for the existing boundary-scan IEEE1149.1 standard and other industry standards to bridge the gap for lack of test point access and improved testability of products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前和未来的制造测试解决方案策略- iNEMI边界扫描和内置自检(BIST)技术集成,以实现未来的标准化
产品成本和收益趋势与测试、检验和测量(TIM)技术的成本不一致。具体来说,虽然摩尔定律适用于产品中的硅,但它并不适用于由此产生的更高功能、更低成本产品的测试总成本。更高的性能和更低的成本的测试设备,虽然也是可取的,但不足以解决不断增加的测试/检验覆盖要求的成本与客户愿意为产品支付的价格之间的差距。必须探索产品设计解决方案(可测试性特性),以促进低成本的测试解决方案,同时保持足够的测试覆盖率。测试方法和策略需要重新考虑。不断增加的产品复杂性和减少的测试点访问促使人们希望增加诸如边界扫描和BIST(内置自检)等技术的使用,以提高测试覆盖率。国际电子制造倡议(iNEMI)有两个正在进行的项目,调查这些差距,并最终推动这些技术部署的行业变革。本文介绍了这两个项目的结果。本文的第一部分介绍了iNEMI边界扫描项目团队的成果,该团队回顾了当前可用的测试外部存储设备的测试方法和策略,并分析了差距和机会。论文的第二部分讨论了BIST技术在板级测试中的机遇和标准化的需求。这两个项目明确了现有边界扫描IEEE1149.1标准和其他行业标准所需的要求,以弥补缺乏测试点访问和提高产品可测试性的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfacial reactions between Sn-3.8 Ag-0.7Cu solder and Ni-W alloy films Removal of flux residues from highly dense assemblies On the drop impact performance of IPDTM devices with different process technologies Pad bending improvement on copper wire bonding on NiP/Pd/Au bond pad Mold compound selection study for CMOS90 176 lead LQFP 24×24mm package
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1