Methodological Discussions on the Use of Tricky Topics Technique for the Focus Group Discussions

Odak Grup, Tartışmaları için Zor, Konular Tekniğinin, Kullanımına İlişkin, Yöntemsel Tartışmalar, Arden Üniversitesi, Akademik Mesleki Gelişim, Birleşik Coventry, Krallık, Zehra Yeler
{"title":"Methodological Discussions on the Use of Tricky Topics Technique for the Focus Group Discussions","authors":"Odak Grup, Tartışmaları için Zor, Konular Tekniğinin, Kullanımına İlişkin, Yöntemsel Tartışmalar, Arden Üniversitesi, Akademik Mesleki Gelişim, Birleşik Coventry, Krallık, Zehra Yeler","doi":"10.5961/higheredusci.1226736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the use of the Tricky Topics (TTs) technique in focus groups as a data collection method in qualitative research. \nThis methodological study originated from a two-phase exploratory study that explored the perspectives of 23 senior Psychological \nCounseling and Guidance students on their online psychological counseling experiences. The data of the original study comprised indepth \nconversations via focus group meetings using the TTs technique. The collected data sets were analyzed through thematic analysis \nusing MAXQDA 2022. During the data collection with the TTs technique, each participant builds on the opinions of others as they \ninvestigate and analyze the issues covered during the focus group. The experiences of the senior Psychological Counseling and Guidance \nprogram students on the use of the TTs technique indicated that using this technique helped them explore the barriers that stop them from \nunderstanding a concept in greater depth. The TTs technique encouraged and motivated participants to further explore the issues of online \ncounseling when they observed others struggling, hesitating, and pausing to conceptualize what prevented them from being more active \nand effective in their practices and learning. This study suggests methodological implications for the TTs technique. When used in focus \ngroup research, the TTs technique provides participants with additional time to analyze how others reacted to the main discussion points. \nIn this study, participants engaged in collaborative discourse and co-created practical measures to strengthen online counseling practices. \nThese interactions resulted in the enhancement of Psychological Counseling and Guidance students’ perceptions of online counseling. \nThis study explains the possible benefits of adopting the TTs technique in focus group interviews in terms of revealing the depth of the \ndata. The implications of this methodology are further discussed, including how the findings could inform other studies that investigate \nspecific concerns within a profession.","PeriodicalId":119364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1226736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the use of the Tricky Topics (TTs) technique in focus groups as a data collection method in qualitative research. This methodological study originated from a two-phase exploratory study that explored the perspectives of 23 senior Psychological Counseling and Guidance students on their online psychological counseling experiences. The data of the original study comprised indepth conversations via focus group meetings using the TTs technique. The collected data sets were analyzed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA 2022. During the data collection with the TTs technique, each participant builds on the opinions of others as they investigate and analyze the issues covered during the focus group. The experiences of the senior Psychological Counseling and Guidance program students on the use of the TTs technique indicated that using this technique helped them explore the barriers that stop them from understanding a concept in greater depth. The TTs technique encouraged and motivated participants to further explore the issues of online counseling when they observed others struggling, hesitating, and pausing to conceptualize what prevented them from being more active and effective in their practices and learning. This study suggests methodological implications for the TTs technique. When used in focus group research, the TTs technique provides participants with additional time to analyze how others reacted to the main discussion points. In this study, participants engaged in collaborative discourse and co-created practical measures to strengthen online counseling practices. These interactions resulted in the enhancement of Psychological Counseling and Guidance students’ perceptions of online counseling. This study explains the possible benefits of adopting the TTs technique in focus group interviews in terms of revealing the depth of the data. The implications of this methodology are further discussed, including how the findings could inform other studies that investigate specific concerns within a profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦点小组讨论中使用棘手话题技术的方法讨论
本文探讨了焦点小组中棘手话题(TTs)技术作为定性研究中数据收集方法的使用。本方法学研究源于一项两阶段的探索性研究,旨在探讨23名心理咨询与指导专业高年级学生对其在线心理咨询经历的看法。原始研究的数据包括使用TTs技术通过焦点小组会议进行的深度对话。利用MAXQDA 2022对收集的数据集进行专题分析。在使用TTs技术收集数据期间,每个参与者在调查和分析焦点小组期间涉及的问题时,都以其他人的意见为基础。高级心理咨询和指导项目的学生使用TTs技术的经验表明,使用这种技术帮助他们探索阻碍他们更深入地理解一个概念的障碍。当参与者观察到其他人在努力、犹豫和暂停,以概念化是什么阻碍了他们在实践和学习中更积极、更有效时,TTs技术鼓励和激励参与者进一步探索在线咨询的问题。本研究提出了TTs技术的方法学意义。当用于焦点小组研究时,TTs技术为参与者提供了额外的时间来分析其他人对主要讨论点的反应。在本研究中,参与者参与协作话语并共同制定实践措施以加强在线咨询实践。这些互动导致心理咨询与指导学生对在线咨询的认知增强。本研究解释了在焦点小组访谈中采用tt技术在揭示数据深度方面可能带来的好处。进一步讨论了这一方法的含义,包括研究结果如何为调查专业内特定问题的其他研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Mental Health Literacy Levels and Attitudes of Seeking Psychological Help of Health Services Vocational School Students: Descriptive Cross-sectional Research Investigation of Perceived Stress and Methods of Collecting Stress in Nursing Students Entering Hospital Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period Determination of Cyberloafing Levels and Reasons of Higher Education Students in the Distance Education Process QR Code Applications in Designing Mathematics Learning Activities Methodological Discussions on the Use of Tricky Topics Technique for the Focus Group Discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1