MOOCs and the Online Delivery of Business Education: What's New? What's Not? What Now?

J. Whitaker, J. R. New, R. Ireland
{"title":"MOOCs and the Online Delivery of Business Education: What's New? What's Not? What Now?","authors":"J. Whitaker, J. R. New, R. Ireland","doi":"10.5465/AMLE.2013.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the past two decades have produced much promise (and accompanying research) on the use of information technology (IT) in business school courses, it is not entirely clear whether IT has truly 'transformed' management education. There are compelling arguments on both sides. On one hand, advocates for the transformative role of IT can point to several success stories. On the other hand, skeptics on the role of IT in management education can also point to support for their view.This lack of consensus has led researchers in Academy of Management Learning and Education to call for scholars to confront the bias against online education (Redpath, 2012) and engage in serious research on online education (Arbaugh, DeArmond, & Rau, 2013). In this work, we respond to these calls for research by using Adaptive Structuration Theory to develop a conceptual model of three factors that influence the use of IT in business education. We review prior research for each factor and use the conceptual model to identify implications for the design and delivery of business education. Based on the implications, we offer recommendations and recognize challenges for business schools and faculty related to the use of IT in business education.","PeriodicalId":424932,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2013.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

While the past two decades have produced much promise (and accompanying research) on the use of information technology (IT) in business school courses, it is not entirely clear whether IT has truly 'transformed' management education. There are compelling arguments on both sides. On one hand, advocates for the transformative role of IT can point to several success stories. On the other hand, skeptics on the role of IT in management education can also point to support for their view.This lack of consensus has led researchers in Academy of Management Learning and Education to call for scholars to confront the bias against online education (Redpath, 2012) and engage in serious research on online education (Arbaugh, DeArmond, & Rau, 2013). In this work, we respond to these calls for research by using Adaptive Structuration Theory to develop a conceptual model of three factors that influence the use of IT in business education. We review prior research for each factor and use the conceptual model to identify implications for the design and delivery of business education. Based on the implications, we offer recommendations and recognize challenges for business schools and faculty related to the use of IT in business education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mooc和在线商业教育:有什么新动向?不是什么?现在该做什么?
尽管过去20年在商学院课程中使用信息技术(IT)方面产生了很多希望(以及相关研究),但IT是否真的“改变”了管理教育,目前还不完全清楚。双方都有令人信服的论据。一方面,IT变革角色的倡导者可以指出几个成功的故事。另一方面,对IT在管理教育中的作用持怀疑态度的人也可以指出支持他们观点的证据。由于缺乏共识,管理学习与教育学院的研究人员呼吁学者们正视对在线教育的偏见(Redpath, 2012),并对在线教育进行认真的研究(Arbaugh, DeArmond, & Rau, 2013)。在这项工作中,我们通过使用自适应结构理论来响应这些研究呼吁,开发了一个影响IT在商业教育中使用的三个因素的概念模型。我们回顾了之前对每个因素的研究,并使用概念模型来确定商业教育设计和交付的含义。基于这些影响,我们提出了建议,并认识到商学院和教师在商业教育中使用IT的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directions of the development of youth innovative start-ups in Belarus Intended and Unintended Effects of Public Incentives for Innovation. Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Italy Motivations, Challenges, and Opportunities of Successful Solvers on an Innovation Intermediary Platform Evaluating an Organizational Innovation: Evidence from the Conglomerate Merger Wave Cleveland Clinic Heart Center: a Legacy of Excellence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1