Evaluating an Organizational Innovation: Evidence from the Conglomerate Merger Wave

Peter G. Klein, Robert Wuebker, Mo Chen, Kathrin Zoeller
{"title":"Evaluating an Organizational Innovation: Evidence from the Conglomerate Merger Wave","authors":"Peter G. Klein, Robert Wuebker, Mo Chen, Kathrin Zoeller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2951330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How do we assess new forms of economic organization? As with other innovations, the value of a new organizational form is initially unknown. When assets are traded in financial markets, the information embodied in prices represent one mechanism through which organizational innovations are evaluated. We apply an experimental-learning framework to explore the influence of the capital markets on economic organization, using the conglomerate merger wave of the 1960s and 1970s as an empirical context. In our setting, the initial market popularity of conglomerates, followed by their rapid decline, is indicative of investors attempting to determine the value of a new organizational form. We provide event-study evidence that investors systematically updated their beliefs about the value of the conglomerate form based on new information (positive or negative) about the largest and most newsworthy conglomerates. Our results suggest that financial market participants make judgments not only about specific companies, but about organizational structure itself.","PeriodicalId":424932,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do we assess new forms of economic organization? As with other innovations, the value of a new organizational form is initially unknown. When assets are traded in financial markets, the information embodied in prices represent one mechanism through which organizational innovations are evaluated. We apply an experimental-learning framework to explore the influence of the capital markets on economic organization, using the conglomerate merger wave of the 1960s and 1970s as an empirical context. In our setting, the initial market popularity of conglomerates, followed by their rapid decline, is indicative of investors attempting to determine the value of a new organizational form. We provide event-study evidence that investors systematically updated their beliefs about the value of the conglomerate form based on new information (positive or negative) about the largest and most newsworthy conglomerates. Our results suggest that financial market participants make judgments not only about specific companies, but about organizational structure itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织创新评价:来自企业集团并购浪潮的证据
我们如何评估新的经济组织形式?与其他创新一样,一种新的组织形式的价值最初是未知的。当资产在金融市场上交易时,体现在价格中的信息代表了评估组织创新的一种机制。本文以20世纪60年代和70年代的企业合并浪潮为实证背景,运用实验学习框架探讨资本市场对经济组织的影响。在我们的背景下,企业集团最初的市场人气,随后迅速下降,表明投资者试图确定一种新的组织形式的价值。我们提供的事件研究证据表明,投资者根据有关最大和最具新闻价值的企业集团的新信息(积极或消极)系统地更新了他们对企业集团形式价值的看法。我们的研究结果表明,金融市场参与者不仅会对特定公司做出判断,还会对组织结构本身做出判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directions of the development of youth innovative start-ups in Belarus Intended and Unintended Effects of Public Incentives for Innovation. Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Italy Motivations, Challenges, and Opportunities of Successful Solvers on an Innovation Intermediary Platform Evaluating an Organizational Innovation: Evidence from the Conglomerate Merger Wave Cleveland Clinic Heart Center: a Legacy of Excellence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1