Competition in Ride-Hailing Markets

AmirMahdi Ahmadinejad, Hamid Nazerzadeh, A. Saberi, Nolan Skochdopole, Kane Sweeney
{"title":"Competition in Ride-Hailing Markets","authors":"AmirMahdi Ahmadinejad, Hamid Nazerzadeh, A. Saberi, Nolan Skochdopole, Kane Sweeney","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3461119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a model for competition between ride-hailing platforms. Riders choose a platform to maximize their utility which is decreasing in price and waiting time. Drivers can accept ride requests from both platforms. Platforms compete via prices over riders and drivers. We investigate whether competition leads to market failure in the form of the ``tragedy of the commons'' as platforms deplete the shared resource of open cars. Our theoretical analysis shows that in all equilibria, riders and drivers will use both platforms and prices will be equal; market failure is a possibility, but under certain conditions, the possibility of rapid deterioration of market throughput deters the platforms from undercutting each other's prices and gives rise to high-throughput equilibria. This result is also supported by numerical analysis, using parameters estimated from Uber data, and simulations. We observe that if riders are not very sensitive to waiting times, the loss of efficiency due to competition could be small.","PeriodicalId":225554,"journal":{"name":"TransportRN: Cost/Benefit Analysis in Practice (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransportRN: Cost/Benefit Analysis in Practice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3461119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We present a model for competition between ride-hailing platforms. Riders choose a platform to maximize their utility which is decreasing in price and waiting time. Drivers can accept ride requests from both platforms. Platforms compete via prices over riders and drivers. We investigate whether competition leads to market failure in the form of the ``tragedy of the commons'' as platforms deplete the shared resource of open cars. Our theoretical analysis shows that in all equilibria, riders and drivers will use both platforms and prices will be equal; market failure is a possibility, but under certain conditions, the possibility of rapid deterioration of market throughput deters the platforms from undercutting each other's prices and gives rise to high-throughput equilibria. This result is also supported by numerical analysis, using parameters estimated from Uber data, and simulations. We observe that if riders are not very sensitive to waiting times, the loss of efficiency due to competition could be small.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网约车市场的竞争
我们提出了一个网约车平台之间竞争的模型。乘客选择一个平台,以最大限度地提高他们的效用,这是在减少价格和等待时间。司机可以接受两个平台的乘车请求。平台通过价格竞争乘客和司机。我们研究了竞争是否会以“公地悲剧”的形式导致市场失灵,因为平台耗尽了开放式汽车的共享资源。我们的理论分析表明,在所有均衡中,乘客和司机都会同时使用两个平台,而且价格是相等的;市场失灵是可能的,但在一定条件下,市场吞吐量迅速恶化的可能性阻止了平台相互削价,从而产生高吞吐量均衡。这一结果也得到了数值分析的支持,使用了从Uber数据中估计的参数,并进行了模拟。我们观察到,如果乘客对等待时间不是很敏感,那么由于竞争而导致的效率损失可能很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Value of Time: Evidence from Auctioned Cab Rides Predicting and Forestalling Market Tipping: The Case of Ride-Hailing Apps in the UK Competition in Ride-Hailing Markets An Exploration of Exchangeable Ticket Airfare: Advantages and Potential Challenges Evaluating Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Entry and Exit Barriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1