Predicting and Forestalling Market Tipping: The Case of Ride-Hailing Apps in the UK

G. Barker, M. Cave
{"title":"Predicting and Forestalling Market Tipping: The Case of Ride-Hailing Apps in the UK","authors":"G. Barker, M. Cave","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3521477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The risk that a two-sided market with strong indirect network effects may tip into a monopoly is well-known. The questions of whether this will happen in practice, whether this creates problems, and if so what can be done to address those problems, are less well investigated. This paper addresses these questions in relation to ride-hailing apps in the UK, also drawing on limited data observations in other countries. \n \nThe UK market place exhibits a large number of car-based transport services which differ in the degree of vertical integration exhibited. In some, the intermediary service of car booking is combined with the provision of the physical service; in the case of a pure ride-hailing app, it is separated. \n \nUK and other countries’ data show that the emergence of ride-hailing apps has had a major effect on the wider market place; such entrants gaining substantial share in a growing market place. The data do not yet permit a firm conclusion as to the inevitability of market tipping in ride-hailing, but the possibility remains. \n \nThe paper considers alternative regulatory measures which might be prepared or adopted against the possibility of such tipping. These include revisions of existing regulation to reduce distortions in the wider market place; new interventions including enhanced data reporting; measures to prevent dominant firms from injuring their rivals by such practices as requiring the single-homing of drivers; data-sharing; and price control.","PeriodicalId":225554,"journal":{"name":"TransportRN: Cost/Benefit Analysis in Practice (Topic)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransportRN: Cost/Benefit Analysis in Practice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The risk that a two-sided market with strong indirect network effects may tip into a monopoly is well-known. The questions of whether this will happen in practice, whether this creates problems, and if so what can be done to address those problems, are less well investigated. This paper addresses these questions in relation to ride-hailing apps in the UK, also drawing on limited data observations in other countries. The UK market place exhibits a large number of car-based transport services which differ in the degree of vertical integration exhibited. In some, the intermediary service of car booking is combined with the provision of the physical service; in the case of a pure ride-hailing app, it is separated. UK and other countries’ data show that the emergence of ride-hailing apps has had a major effect on the wider market place; such entrants gaining substantial share in a growing market place. The data do not yet permit a firm conclusion as to the inevitability of market tipping in ride-hailing, but the possibility remains. The paper considers alternative regulatory measures which might be prepared or adopted against the possibility of such tipping. These include revisions of existing regulation to reduce distortions in the wider market place; new interventions including enhanced data reporting; measures to prevent dominant firms from injuring their rivals by such practices as requiring the single-homing of drivers; data-sharing; and price control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测和预防市场小费:以英国打车应用为例
具有强大间接网络效应的双边市场可能陷入垄断的风险是众所周知的。这些问题是否会在实践中发生,是否会产生问题,如果会产生问题,可以做些什么来解决这些问题,都没有得到很好的调查。本文针对英国打车应用的这些问题,也借鉴了其他国家有限的数据观察。英国市场展示了大量以汽车为基础的运输服务,这些服务在垂直整合的程度上有所不同。在某些情况下,租车的中介服务与实体服务的提供相结合;在纯叫车应用的情况下,它是分开的。英国和其他国家的数据显示,打车应用的出现对更广泛的市场产生了重大影响;这些进入者在不断增长的市场中获得了可观的份额。目前的数据还不能让我们对网约车市场小费的必然性做出确切的结论,但这种可能性仍然存在。该文件考虑了可能准备或采用的替代监管措施,以防止此类小费的可能性。这些措施包括修订现有法规,以减少更广泛市场中的扭曲;新的干预措施,包括加强数据报告;采取措施防止占主导地位的公司通过要求司机单独驾驶等做法伤害竞争对手;数据共享;还有价格控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Value of Time: Evidence from Auctioned Cab Rides Predicting and Forestalling Market Tipping: The Case of Ride-Hailing Apps in the UK Competition in Ride-Hailing Markets An Exploration of Exchangeable Ticket Airfare: Advantages and Potential Challenges Evaluating Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Entry and Exit Barriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1