KELALAIAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG R.I NOMOR 2604 K/Pdt/2019

M. Lubis, Tajuddin Noor
{"title":"KELALAIAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG R.I NOMOR 2604 K/Pdt/2019","authors":"M. Lubis, Tajuddin Noor","doi":"10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A notary is a public official of the state who is given the right and authority to make state documents or deeds that are needed by the public to obtain legal recognition and validity. A Notary cannot refuse an application for a deed and can be sued if he refuses without a clear reason as per the code of ethics of his position as a Notary. The type of research in this study is normative juridical with a research study approach to dispute cases in Decision Number 2604 K/Pdt/2019 concerning Notary Accountability for Negligence in making Authentic Deeds that occurred in Banjarmasin, a Notary is considered to have been negligent in carrying out his duties because he violated the provisions of Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m. In the decision, the Panel of Judges stated that the Notary is obliged to withdraw/cross/delete the Deed that has resulted in a loss in the agreement. Conclusions on negligence caused by a Notary in carrying out his duties resulted in an Authentic Deed which has a strong evidentiary value turned into an underhand deed. Of course this reduces the privilege of the Authentic Deed, so the regulation regarding sanctions for violations in making the Authentic Deed must be strengthened, so that the Notary upholds the nature of prudence and vigilance in carrying out his duties. As well as a lack of understanding of the procedure for reporting losses to Notaries, socialized more clearly.","PeriodicalId":448059,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A notary is a public official of the state who is given the right and authority to make state documents or deeds that are needed by the public to obtain legal recognition and validity. A Notary cannot refuse an application for a deed and can be sued if he refuses without a clear reason as per the code of ethics of his position as a Notary. The type of research in this study is normative juridical with a research study approach to dispute cases in Decision Number 2604 K/Pdt/2019 concerning Notary Accountability for Negligence in making Authentic Deeds that occurred in Banjarmasin, a Notary is considered to have been negligent in carrying out his duties because he violated the provisions of Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m. In the decision, the Panel of Judges stated that the Notary is obliged to withdraw/cross/delete the Deed that has resulted in a loss in the agreement. Conclusions on negligence caused by a Notary in carrying out his duties resulted in an Authentic Deed which has a strong evidentiary value turned into an underhand deed. Of course this reduces the privilege of the Authentic Deed, so the regulation regarding sanctions for violations in making the Authentic Deed must be strengthened, so that the Notary upholds the nature of prudence and vigilance in carrying out his duties. As well as a lack of understanding of the procedure for reporting losses to Notaries, socialized more clearly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公证人是国家的公职人员,他们被赋予权利和权力来制作公众需要的国家文件或契约,以获得法律承认和有效性。公证员不能拒绝契约申请,如果他没有明确的理由拒绝,根据公证员的职业道德准则,他可能会被起诉。本研究的研究类型是规范的司法研究方法,采用研究方法研究第2604 K/Pdt/2019号决定中的争议案件,该决定涉及Banjarmasin发生的公证在制作真实契约时的疏忽责任,公证员被认为在履行职责时存在疏忽,因为他违反了第16条第(1)款的规定。在该决定中,法官小组指出,公证人有义务撤回/交叉/删除在协议中造成损失的契约。关于公证员在履行职责过程中存在过失的结论,导致具有较强证据价值的《真实契据》变成了一份不正当契据。当然,这降低了公证的特权,因此必须加强有关在制作公证时违反规定的处罚规定,使公证员在履行职责时保持谨慎和警惕的性质。以及对向公证人报告损失的程序缺乏了解,社会化程度比较清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK NORMATIF PEKERJAPASCA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PERLINDUNGAN HAK PEREMPUAN BERDASARKAN CONVENTION ON ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINTS WOMEN (CEDAW) DALAM TRADISI KAWIN TANGKAP DI SUMBA OBJEK SYIRKAH MENJADI JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PEMBIAYAAN PERUMAHAN MELALUI AKAD MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISHAH TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKSANAAN REKLAMASI DAN PASCA TAMBANG PERUSAHAAN PEMEGANG IUP OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA BERDASARKAN PRINSIP GOOD MINING PRACTICE ANALISIS PEMBERIAN SUAKA OLEH HONGARIA PADA HUNGARIAN ASYLUM POLICY 2015 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP NON-PENALIZATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1