On the history of the ban on abortion in the USSR: the views of the authorities and Soviet public opinion from the perspective of bioethics (1935–1936)

N. Pivovarov, Fsaei He I.M. Sechenov First Msmu Moh Russia, N. P. Shok, Fsbei Fpe Rmacpe Moh Russia
{"title":"On the history of the ban on abortion in the USSR: the views of the authorities and Soviet public opinion from the perspective of bioethics (1935–1936)","authors":"N. Pivovarov, Fsaei He I.M. Sechenov First Msmu Moh Russia, N. P. Shok, Fsbei Fpe Rmacpe Moh Russia","doi":"10.17720/2409-5834.V6.2.2019.08H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at the debate in the USSR in 1935–1936 on banning abortions. This episode of Soviet history has enormous heuristic potential for researchers studying the Soviet period. At first sight, the bill to ban abortions appears simply a matter of historical medical fact, based on which we can in many ways draw conclusions about the situation in healthcare in general, and in obstetrics and gynaecology in particular. However, this small-scale episode in the history of Soviet healthcare provides scope for substantial cross-disciplinary research prospects in fields such as anthropology, sociology, political science, and so on, significantly expanding the research horizons of the Soviet past. Our analysis of the abortion ban debate draws on two groups of sources. The first comprises documents of the highest Communist Party and government bodies, stored in the thematic files of the Soviet Politburo. Particular attention is paid to the notes and marginalia made by Stalin in the drafts of the law to ban abortions. Practically all the materials in this group have been officially declassified only comparatively recently, and now being studied for the first time. The second group of sources comprises letters from members of the Soviet public to the highest organs of government and to national and local periodicals. The letters present a wide range of opinions and observations on the bill to ban abortions. Comparing these two groups of sources has allowed us to become the first Russian researchers to study the development of ethical discourse, and show the history of the emergence of bioethical discourse, in the Soviet period.","PeriodicalId":274992,"journal":{"name":"Istoriya meditsiny","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoriya meditsiny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17720/2409-5834.V6.2.2019.08H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article looks at the debate in the USSR in 1935–1936 on banning abortions. This episode of Soviet history has enormous heuristic potential for researchers studying the Soviet period. At first sight, the bill to ban abortions appears simply a matter of historical medical fact, based on which we can in many ways draw conclusions about the situation in healthcare in general, and in obstetrics and gynaecology in particular. However, this small-scale episode in the history of Soviet healthcare provides scope for substantial cross-disciplinary research prospects in fields such as anthropology, sociology, political science, and so on, significantly expanding the research horizons of the Soviet past. Our analysis of the abortion ban debate draws on two groups of sources. The first comprises documents of the highest Communist Party and government bodies, stored in the thematic files of the Soviet Politburo. Particular attention is paid to the notes and marginalia made by Stalin in the drafts of the law to ban abortions. Practically all the materials in this group have been officially declassified only comparatively recently, and now being studied for the first time. The second group of sources comprises letters from members of the Soviet public to the highest organs of government and to national and local periodicals. The letters present a wide range of opinions and observations on the bill to ban abortions. Comparing these two groups of sources has allowed us to become the first Russian researchers to study the development of ethical discourse, and show the history of the emergence of bioethical discourse, in the Soviet period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论苏联禁止堕胎的历史:从生命伦理学的角度看当局和苏联舆论的观点(1935-1936)
这篇文章着眼于1935-1936年苏联关于禁止堕胎的辩论。这段苏联历史对于研究苏联时期的研究者具有巨大的启发潜力。乍一看,禁止堕胎的法案似乎只是一个历史医学事实,根据这一事实,我们可以从许多方面得出关于一般保健状况,特别是妇产科状况的结论。然而,这一苏联医疗保健史上的小插曲为人类学、社会学、政治学等领域的大量跨学科研究前景提供了空间,极大地扩展了苏联过去的研究视野。我们对堕胎禁令辩论的分析借鉴了两组资料。第一类包括共产党和政府最高机构的文件,存放在苏联政治局的专题文件中。特别值得注意的是斯大林在禁止堕胎的法律草案中所作的注释和旁注。实际上,这一组中的所有材料直到最近才被正式解密,现在是第一次被研究。第二组资料来源包括苏联公众成员给最高政府机关和国家和地方期刊的信件。这些信件对禁止堕胎的法案提出了广泛的意见和观察。比较这两组资料,使我们成为第一批研究伦理话语发展的俄罗斯研究者,并展示了苏联时期生物伦理话语出现的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the history of the ban on abortion in the USSR: the views of the authorities and Soviet public opinion from the perspective of bioethics (1935–1936) History of surgery: the evolution of views on the formation of intestinal stoma Medical education and academic traditions in universities and institutes of European countries through the eyes of professors, teachers and staff of the Imperial Tomsk University (1902–1914) The origins of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics: historical, sociocultural and political contexts A page in the history of Soviet clinical medicine: the establishment of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences and the formalisation of the therapeutic elite (1944–1948)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1