The origins of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics: historical, sociocultural and political contexts

V. Tikhonov
{"title":"The origins of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics: historical, sociocultural and political contexts","authors":"V. Tikhonov","doi":"10.17720/2409-5583.V6.1.2019.05E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies and analyses the historical, sociocultural and political background to the establishment of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics. Soviet society was dominated by “scientific optimism”. While bioethics in the West was institutionalised as a distinct area of research as the downsides of progress in science and technology were recognised, in the USSR this was impeded by ideological constraints. Nevertheless, Ivan Frolov and Boris Yudin worked on problems of the impact of science and technology on society from the perspective of bioethics. In the years of perestroika, against the backdrop of a change in the ideological and intellectual atmosphere, problems including environmental issues and those directly related to bioethics were discussed in public more and more. At the same time, bioethics was being institutionalised. For example, the International Association of Bioethics was established in 1990, and Soviet scientists were invited to join it. This required establishing a Soviet national committee, which Frolov set about organising. On the basis of archive material, this article provides a detailed analysis of a meeting of the Presidium of the Soviet Academy of Sciences on 29 October 1991, which proved to be a landmark event in the history of bioethics in Russia. This meeting revealed two things: that the Presidium’s scientists were poorly informed about bioethical issues, and that public interest in such issues was growing. As such, general trends in the development of science, and an understanding of the social and humanitarian challenges went hand in hand with the emergence of a more questioning society and political liberalisation in the wake of perestroika. In terms of the social history of science, the crisis of consciousness in Soviet society in the late 1980s, when it became possible to speak of its backwardness in many areas of life, including those directly related to bioethics, also played a certain role. In addition, the development of the field of bioethics in Russia was due in no small part to the initiative shown by Academician Frolov.","PeriodicalId":274992,"journal":{"name":"Istoriya meditsiny","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoriya meditsiny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17720/2409-5583.V6.1.2019.05E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article identifies and analyses the historical, sociocultural and political background to the establishment of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics. Soviet society was dominated by “scientific optimism”. While bioethics in the West was institutionalised as a distinct area of research as the downsides of progress in science and technology were recognised, in the USSR this was impeded by ideological constraints. Nevertheless, Ivan Frolov and Boris Yudin worked on problems of the impact of science and technology on society from the perspective of bioethics. In the years of perestroika, against the backdrop of a change in the ideological and intellectual atmosphere, problems including environmental issues and those directly related to bioethics were discussed in public more and more. At the same time, bioethics was being institutionalised. For example, the International Association of Bioethics was established in 1990, and Soviet scientists were invited to join it. This required establishing a Soviet national committee, which Frolov set about organising. On the basis of archive material, this article provides a detailed analysis of a meeting of the Presidium of the Soviet Academy of Sciences on 29 October 1991, which proved to be a landmark event in the history of bioethics in Russia. This meeting revealed two things: that the Presidium’s scientists were poorly informed about bioethical issues, and that public interest in such issues was growing. As such, general trends in the development of science, and an understanding of the social and humanitarian challenges went hand in hand with the emergence of a more questioning society and political liberalisation in the wake of perestroika. In terms of the social history of science, the crisis of consciousness in Soviet society in the late 1980s, when it became possible to speak of its backwardness in many areas of life, including those directly related to bioethics, also played a certain role. In addition, the development of the field of bioethics in Russia was due in no small part to the initiative shown by Academician Frolov.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯国家生命伦理委员会的起源:历史、社会文化和政治背景
本文确定并分析了俄罗斯国家生命伦理委员会成立的历史、社会文化和政治背景。苏联社会被“科学乐观主义”所主导。在西方,随着科学技术进步的负面影响被认识到,生物伦理学作为一个独特的研究领域被制度化,而在苏联,这受到意识形态限制的阻碍。然而,Ivan Frolov和Boris Yudin从生命伦理学的角度研究科学技术对社会的影响问题。在改革开放的年代,在思想和知识氛围发生变化的背景下,包括环境问题和与生命伦理直接相关的问题越来越多地被公开讨论。与此同时,生物伦理学正在制度化。例如,国际生物伦理学协会成立于1990年,苏联科学家被邀请加入该协会。这需要建立一个苏联全国委员会,弗罗洛夫着手组织这个委员会。本文在档案资料的基础上,详细分析了1991年10月29日苏联科学院主席团的一次会议,这次会议被证明是俄罗斯生命伦理学史上具有里程碑意义的事件。这次会议揭示了两件事:主席团的科学家对生物伦理问题知之甚少,公众对这些问题的兴趣正在增长。因此,科学发展的总体趋势以及对社会和人道主义挑战的理解与改革后出现的更具质疑性的社会和政治自由化密切相关。就科学社会史而言,20世纪80年代末苏联社会的意识危机也发挥了一定的作用,当时苏联社会在许多生活领域,包括与生命伦理学直接相关的领域,都有可能谈论它的落后。此外,俄罗斯生命伦理学领域的发展在很大程度上要归功于弗罗洛夫院士所表现出的主动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the history of the ban on abortion in the USSR: the views of the authorities and Soviet public opinion from the perspective of bioethics (1935–1936) History of surgery: the evolution of views on the formation of intestinal stoma Medical education and academic traditions in universities and institutes of European countries through the eyes of professors, teachers and staff of the Imperial Tomsk University (1902–1914) The origins of the Russian National Committee on Bioethics: historical, sociocultural and political contexts A page in the history of Soviet clinical medicine: the establishment of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences and the formalisation of the therapeutic elite (1944–1948)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1