Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study

Engin Karadağ, Nihan Sölpük
{"title":"Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study","authors":"Engin Karadağ, Nihan Sölpük","doi":"10.5350/dajpn2018310204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study Objective: This meta-analysis study aimed to test the relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms by analyzing the studies on depression and anxiety symptoms in Turkey. The study was carried out in two stages to determine the effect of depression sypmtoms on the anxiety sypmtoms, and the moderators that could affect the mean effect size obtained in this study. Method: In order to determine the studies that will be included in the meta-analysis, a search was made in the National Higher Education Council’s National Thesis Center, ULAKBIM Social and Humanities Database, ULAKBIM Medical Data Base and Google Academic Database. In this phase, all studies including depression and anxiety were recorded by using the terms related with anxiety and depression. The screening process was reduced to title, keyword and summary fields to create study pool (143 studies). Subsequently, with the detailed examination of studies, 74 studies were excluded and 69 studies were included in the sample in accordance with the study criteria. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) was calculated as the effect size in the analysis and the random effect model was used. Results: In the study, the mean effect size depression on anxiety was calculated as 0.53, with a lower limit value of 0.48 and an upper limit value of 0.58. In addition, there was a difference between the size of effect observed in the study and the size of the virtual effect generated according to the random effects model aimed to correct the effect caused by the publication bias. Conclusion: Confidence intervals of 69 studies included in meta-analysis study were narrow, meaning that the decisions which will be made taking into consideration the data obtained from these studies are reliable. It has been found that depression has a positive effect on a wide range of anxiety. According to these findings, as depression levels increase, anxiety levels also increase, or as depression levels decrease, anxiety levels decrease. Overall, moderator variables of anxiety type, anxiety scale, and depression scale affect the relationship between depression and anxiety of individuals. Anxiety and depression levels can vary according to these moderator variables.","PeriodicalId":136580,"journal":{"name":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5350/dajpn2018310204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study Objective: This meta-analysis study aimed to test the relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms by analyzing the studies on depression and anxiety symptoms in Turkey. The study was carried out in two stages to determine the effect of depression sypmtoms on the anxiety sypmtoms, and the moderators that could affect the mean effect size obtained in this study. Method: In order to determine the studies that will be included in the meta-analysis, a search was made in the National Higher Education Council’s National Thesis Center, ULAKBIM Social and Humanities Database, ULAKBIM Medical Data Base and Google Academic Database. In this phase, all studies including depression and anxiety were recorded by using the terms related with anxiety and depression. The screening process was reduced to title, keyword and summary fields to create study pool (143 studies). Subsequently, with the detailed examination of studies, 74 studies were excluded and 69 studies were included in the sample in accordance with the study criteria. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) was calculated as the effect size in the analysis and the random effect model was used. Results: In the study, the mean effect size depression on anxiety was calculated as 0.53, with a lower limit value of 0.48 and an upper limit value of 0.58. In addition, there was a difference between the size of effect observed in the study and the size of the virtual effect generated according to the random effects model aimed to correct the effect caused by the publication bias. Conclusion: Confidence intervals of 69 studies included in meta-analysis study were narrow, meaning that the decisions which will be made taking into consideration the data obtained from these studies are reliable. It has been found that depression has a positive effect on a wide range of anxiety. According to these findings, as depression levels increase, anxiety levels also increase, or as depression levels decrease, anxiety levels decrease. Overall, moderator variables of anxiety type, anxiety scale, and depression scale affect the relationship between depression and anxiety of individuals. Anxiety and depression levels can vary according to these moderator variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在土耳其进行的研究中抑郁和焦虑症状之间的关系:一项荟萃分析研究
土耳其研究中抑郁与焦虑症状的关系:一项荟萃分析研究目的:本荟萃分析研究旨在通过分析土耳其抑郁与焦虑症状的研究,检验抑郁与焦虑症状之间的关系。本研究分两个阶段进行,以确定抑郁症状对焦虑症状的影响,以及可能影响本研究获得的平均效应大小的调节因子。方法:为了确定将被纳入meta分析的研究,在国家高等教育委员会国家论文中心、ULAKBIM社会与人文数据库、ULAKBIM医学数据库和谷歌学术数据库中进行了检索。在这一阶段,包括抑郁和焦虑在内的所有研究都使用与焦虑和抑郁相关的术语进行记录。筛选过程简化为标题、关键词和摘要字段,以创建研究池(143项研究)。随后,通过对研究的详细检查,根据研究标准排除74项研究,纳入69项研究。计算Pearson相关系数(r)作为分析中的效应量,采用随机效应模型。结果:本研究抑郁对焦虑的平均效应大小计算为0.53,下限为0.48,上限为0.58。此外,研究中观察到的效应大小与根据随机效应模型产生的虚拟效应大小存在差异,该模型旨在纠正发表偏倚造成的效应。结论:纳入meta分析研究的69项研究的置信区间较窄,这意味着考虑这些研究获得的数据将做出的决策是可靠的。研究发现,抑郁对很多焦虑都有积极的影响。根据这些发现,随着抑郁程度的增加,焦虑程度也会增加,或者随着抑郁程度的减少,焦虑程度会减少。总体而言,焦虑类型、焦虑量表和抑郁量表的调节变量影响个体抑郁与焦虑的关系。焦虑和抑郁水平可以根据这些调节变量而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task Mirtazapine-related manic / hypomanic shift: mini review and case report Psychosurgery and other invasive approaches in treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a brief overview through a case Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study Comorbidity of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1