The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task

Rahmi Saylik, Santiago Castiello, R. A. Murphy
{"title":"The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task","authors":"Rahmi Saylik, Santiago Castiello, R. A. Murphy","doi":"10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: Rahmi Saylik, Mus Alparslan University, Department of Psychology, Mus Turkey E-mail: r.saylik@alparslan.edu.tr Received: October 27, 2020; Revised: November 27, 2020; Accepted: March 09, 2021 ABSTRACT Objective: Reversing learned associations interferes with previously acquired learning, a form of retroactive interference for the previous association and proactive interference on the new learning. We examined associations involving emotional content and how they might impact interference. The current study aims to discover the role positive, negative, and nonemotional stimuli play during acquisition and reversal learning in a probabilistic go/no-go task. Method: The task consisted of separate conditions of happy, sad, angry, fearful emotional stimuli and non-emotional stimuli during separate acquisition and reversal training periods. Ninety-seven participants aged 18-35 (49 females) took part in the study. Results: The results revealed that overall, participants were more accurate during acquisition than reversal. Further, happy stimuli were learned with greater accuracy during acquisition but were no easier to learn in reversal, effectively accompanied by a greater reversal cost. Conclusion: There is evidence that happy emotional stimuli act like stimuli with a stronger learning rate much like learning of other high salience stimuli. Emotion valanced stimuli like other types of stimuli and can be described mechanistically by varying learning rate parameters of associative models.","PeriodicalId":136580,"journal":{"name":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correspondence: Rahmi Saylik, Mus Alparslan University, Department of Psychology, Mus Turkey E-mail: r.saylik@alparslan.edu.tr Received: October 27, 2020; Revised: November 27, 2020; Accepted: March 09, 2021 ABSTRACT Objective: Reversing learned associations interferes with previously acquired learning, a form of retroactive interference for the previous association and proactive interference on the new learning. We examined associations involving emotional content and how they might impact interference. The current study aims to discover the role positive, negative, and nonemotional stimuli play during acquisition and reversal learning in a probabilistic go/no-go task. Method: The task consisted of separate conditions of happy, sad, angry, fearful emotional stimuli and non-emotional stimuli during separate acquisition and reversal training periods. Ninety-seven participants aged 18-35 (49 females) took part in the study. Results: The results revealed that overall, participants were more accurate during acquisition than reversal. Further, happy stimuli were learned with greater accuracy during acquisition but were no easier to learn in reversal, effectively accompanied by a greater reversal cost. Conclusion: There is evidence that happy emotional stimuli act like stimuli with a stronger learning rate much like learning of other high salience stimuli. Emotion valanced stimuli like other types of stimuli and can be described mechanistically by varying learning rate parameters of associative models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪性概率围棋/不围棋任务中情绪干扰对学习的作用
通讯:Rahmi Saylik, Mus Alparslan University,心理学系,Mus Turkey E-mail: r.saylik@alparslan.edu.tr收稿日期:2020年10月27日;修订日期:2020年11月27日;摘要目的:反向学习关联干扰先前获得的学习,是对先前关联的回溯干扰和对新学习的主动干扰。我们研究了涉及情感内容的关联,以及它们如何影响干扰。本研究旨在探讨积极、消极和非情绪刺激在概率去/不去任务中习得和反转学习中的作用。方法:采用快乐、悲伤、愤怒、恐惧、情绪刺激和非情绪刺激分别进行习得和逆转训练。97名年龄在18-35岁之间的参与者(49名女性)参加了这项研究。结果:结果显示,总体而言,参与者在习得过程中比在反转过程中更准确。此外,快乐刺激在习得过程中学习的准确性更高,但在反转过程中学习并不容易,这实际上伴随着更大的反转成本。结论:有证据表明,快乐的情绪刺激就像具有更强学习率的刺激一样,就像学习其他高显著性刺激一样。情绪价值刺激与其他类型的刺激一样,可以通过改变联想模型的学习率参数来机械地描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task Mirtazapine-related manic / hypomanic shift: mini review and case report Psychosurgery and other invasive approaches in treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a brief overview through a case Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study Comorbidity of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1