Performativity, Possibility, and Land Acknowledgments in Academia: Community-Engaged Work as Decolonial Praxis in the COVID-19 Context

Sammy Roth, Tria Blu Wakpa
{"title":"Performativity, Possibility, and Land Acknowledgments in Academia: Community-Engaged Work as Decolonial Praxis in the COVID-19 Context","authors":"Sammy Roth, Tria Blu Wakpa","doi":"10.7202/1099882ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the intersection of dance, performance, and Indigenous studies, this essay reflects on how an assistant professor at the University of California, Los Angeles—with the support of a graduate student researcher—has aimed to put an Indigenous land acknowledgment into praxis through community-engaged work. In academic settings, land acknowledgments are often given prior to an event and may circulate on written materials, such as event programs, syllabi, letterhead, departmental and research centre websites, and email signatures. Based on Indigenous protocols, these statements typically identify the original Indigenous peoples whose land the university currently occupies; they should also be created in collaboration with Indigenous leaders from the tribe(s). Indigenous land acknowledgments can be important because they directly combat the injustice of settler-capitalist, mainstream discourses that often obscure Indigenous peoples and practices or relegate them to the historical past. Yet, Indigenous people and Indigenous studies scholars have critiqued non-Native land acknowledgments as “performative.” Without direct material benefits to Indigenous peoples, land acknowledgments can serve as empty gestures that “perform” university commitments to anti-racism, equity, diversity, and inclusion. In contrast to the “performative” as an empty gesture, the fields of performance and dance studies frequently theorize “performativity” as a material action that can function both hegemonically and subversively. This essay argues that community-engaged research, teaching, and service—which the authors view holistically—are key ways to begin or further the process of putting a university’s land acknowledgment into action.","PeriodicalId":212884,"journal":{"name":"The Syllabus is the Thing: Materialities of the Performance Studies Classroom","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Syllabus is the Thing: Materialities of the Performance Studies Classroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1099882ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the intersection of dance, performance, and Indigenous studies, this essay reflects on how an assistant professor at the University of California, Los Angeles—with the support of a graduate student researcher—has aimed to put an Indigenous land acknowledgment into praxis through community-engaged work. In academic settings, land acknowledgments are often given prior to an event and may circulate on written materials, such as event programs, syllabi, letterhead, departmental and research centre websites, and email signatures. Based on Indigenous protocols, these statements typically identify the original Indigenous peoples whose land the university currently occupies; they should also be created in collaboration with Indigenous leaders from the tribe(s). Indigenous land acknowledgments can be important because they directly combat the injustice of settler-capitalist, mainstream discourses that often obscure Indigenous peoples and practices or relegate them to the historical past. Yet, Indigenous people and Indigenous studies scholars have critiqued non-Native land acknowledgments as “performative.” Without direct material benefits to Indigenous peoples, land acknowledgments can serve as empty gestures that “perform” university commitments to anti-racism, equity, diversity, and inclusion. In contrast to the “performative” as an empty gesture, the fields of performance and dance studies frequently theorize “performativity” as a material action that can function both hegemonically and subversively. This essay argues that community-engaged research, teaching, and service—which the authors view holistically—are key ways to begin or further the process of putting a university’s land acknowledgment into action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术界的表演性、可能性和土地承认:社区参与的工作作为COVID-19背景下的非殖民化实践
在舞蹈、表演和土著研究的交叉点上,这篇文章反映了加州大学洛杉矶分校的一位助理教授如何在一名研究生研究人员的支持下,旨在通过社区参与的工作,将土著土地的认可付诸实践。在学术环境中,土地确认通常在活动之前发出,并可能以书面材料传播,例如活动计划,教学大纲,信笺,部门和研究中心网站以及电子邮件签名。根据土著协议,这些声明通常确定大学目前占用其土地的原始土著人民;它们也应与部落的土著领导人合作创建。土著土地的承认可能很重要,因为它们直接与定居者-资本主义的不公正现象作斗争,主流话语往往掩盖土著人民和做法,或将他们置于历史的过去。然而,土著居民和土著研究学者批评非土著土地承认是“表演的”。如果没有给土著人民带来直接的物质利益,土地承认就会成为空洞的姿态,“履行”大学对反种族主义、平等、多样性和包容性的承诺。与“表演性”作为一种空洞的姿态相反,表演和舞蹈研究领域经常将“表演性”理论化为一种既具有霸权性又具有颠覆性的物质行为。本文认为,社区参与的研究、教学和服务——作者从整体上看——是开始或进一步将大学土地承认过程付诸行动的关键途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Syllabus for Race, Performance, and Media Studies Collective Curation across Difference: Performing Live with Race, Gender, and Sexuality The Unwieldy Otherwise: Rethinking the Roots of Performance Studies in and through the Black Freedom Struggle Un/Commoning Pedagogies: Forging Collectivity Through Difference in the Embodied Classroom and Beyond Performativity, Possibility, and Land Acknowledgments in Academia: Community-Engaged Work as Decolonial Praxis in the COVID-19 Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1