VECHE OF THE POMERANIAN SLAVS IN THE ELEVENTH–TWELFTH CENTURIES (to the historiography of the problem)

Nazar Rizun
{"title":"VECHE OF THE POMERANIAN SLAVS IN THE ELEVENTH–TWELFTH CENTURIES (to the historiography of the problem)","authors":"Nazar Rizun","doi":"10.30970/sls.2019.68.3069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The research on early medieval Pomerania (eleventh–twelfth centuries) and its assemblies discusses a variety of interpretations. Scholars explain veche and its place in the governance of the region based on their understanding of Slavic societies. Historians trace the development of Pomerania during the Early Middle Ages, analyze gradual transformation of its institutions. Recent studies use such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom as well as the newest archaeological material. Purpose: The goal of the article is to study the research on veche, particularly the most recent publications. Among them, the works of such historians and archaeologists as Piotr Boroс, Karol Modzelewski, Roman Zaroff, Michaі Tymowski, Michaі Kara, Przemysіaw Urbaсczyk, and others. The paper investigates their understanding of the place of assemblies in the governance of early medieval Pomerania as well as the appliance of such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom. Results: Pomeranian veche could be understood both as an element of the early medieval societies and as a way of collective decision-making. The article highlights various approaches to the study of veche, specifically the appliance of such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom. The paper investigates their usefulness for the research on early medieval Pomerania and its assemblies. The concepts of segmentary structures and chiefdom describe local communities and regional political formations, respectively. They help to distinguish a few levels of governance, to analyze relations between various parts of early medieval societies, and to trace integration as well as state formation processes. The future studies could continue the discussion about the appliance of different methodological approaches in research on well-known and fragmentary source material. Key words: veche, Pomerania, historiography, segmentary structures, chiefdom.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of slavonic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2019.68.3069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The research on early medieval Pomerania (eleventh–twelfth centuries) and its assemblies discusses a variety of interpretations. Scholars explain veche and its place in the governance of the region based on their understanding of Slavic societies. Historians trace the development of Pomerania during the Early Middle Ages, analyze gradual transformation of its institutions. Recent studies use such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom as well as the newest archaeological material. Purpose: The goal of the article is to study the research on veche, particularly the most recent publications. Among them, the works of such historians and archaeologists as Piotr Boroс, Karol Modzelewski, Roman Zaroff, Michaі Tymowski, Michaі Kara, Przemysіaw Urbaсczyk, and others. The paper investigates their understanding of the place of assemblies in the governance of early medieval Pomerania as well as the appliance of such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom. Results: Pomeranian veche could be understood both as an element of the early medieval societies and as a way of collective decision-making. The article highlights various approaches to the study of veche, specifically the appliance of such concepts as segmentary structures and chiefdom. The paper investigates their usefulness for the research on early medieval Pomerania and its assemblies. The concepts of segmentary structures and chiefdom describe local communities and regional political formations, respectively. They help to distinguish a few levels of governance, to analyze relations between various parts of early medieval societies, and to trace integration as well as state formation processes. The future studies could continue the discussion about the appliance of different methodological approaches in research on well-known and fragmentary source material. Key words: veche, Pomerania, historiography, segmentary structures, chiefdom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
11 - 12世纪波美拉尼亚斯拉夫人的维奇(对这个问题的史学研究)
背景:对中世纪早期波美拉尼亚(11 - 12世纪)及其议会的研究讨论了各种各样的解释。学者们根据他们对斯拉夫社会的理解来解释维奇及其在该地区治理中的地位。历史学家追溯中世纪早期波美拉尼亚的发展,分析其制度的逐渐转变。最近的研究使用了分段结构和部落等概念以及最新的考古材料。目的:本文的目的是研究veche的研究,特别是最近的出版物。其中,历史学家和考古学家的作品,如Piotr borovlak, Karol Modzelewski, Roman Zaroff, michak Tymowski, michak Kara, przemysaw urbaserczyk等人。本文调查了他们对中世纪早期波美拉尼亚治理中集会的理解,以及分段结构和酋长制等概念的应用。结果:波美拉尼亚维奇既可以被理解为中世纪早期社会的一个元素,也可以被理解为集体决策的一种方式。文章重点介绍了各种研究方法,特别是节段结构和主体性等概念的应用。本文探讨了它们在中世纪早期波美拉尼亚及其集会研究中的作用。分段结构和酋长制的概念分别描述了地方社区和区域政治形态。它们有助于区分几个层次的治理,分析早期中世纪社会各部分之间的关系,并追踪整合以及国家形成过程。未来的研究可以继续讨论不同的方法方法在研究已知的和零碎的原始材料中的应用。关键词:维切人;波美拉尼亚人;史学;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intermediate improvisations in M. Prodanovich's novel “Red handkerchief made of pure silk” Historical fact as a structural element of “Legion-naire’s notes” by Joseph Honza-Dubnitsky To the reception P. Y. Shafarik’s ideas about the primacy of the glagolitics at the current stage of paleoslavistics development ARTISTIC TRANSCRIPTION OF THE EDGAR ALLAN POE'S IMAGERY IN ANTUN GUSTAV MATOŠ'S AND MYKHAILO YATSKIV'S PROSE Cyrilo-Methodian tradition and its forms in some works of Slovak literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1