{"title":"Attitudes of Primary School Teachers Towards Inclusion of Children with Special Needs in Mainstream Educational Programs in Primary School","authors":"Anja Valenčić Štembergar","doi":"10.32903/zs.67.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The\narticle explores the attitudes of primary school teachers towards the inclusion\nof children with special needs in mainstream educational programs in primary\nschools. The theoretical part discusses the requirements of the new school\nsystem imposed on teachers. The empirical part presents a study on the\nattitudes of primary school teachers towards the inclusion of children with\nspecial needs in mainstream primary schools and on whether there are\ndifferences in attitudes between younger and older teachers. Descriptive and\ninferential methods of empirical pedagogical research were used in this paper.\nThe data was collected through an online questionnaire filled out by primary\nschool teachers across Slovenia. The study results showed that all teachers,\nregardless of age, feel that they are not sufficiently trained to work with\nchildren with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). At the same\ntime, they agree that they did not acquire enough skills during their\nundergraduate studies to work with these children. Furthermore, the teachers\nfeel they do not have enough experience working with these children. At the\nsame time, they agree that the children with SEND should be included in\nprograms specifically tailored to their needs and not in mainstream primary\nschool programs. Additionally, the results have shown that teachers think it is\nnecessary to set different educational goals for children with SEND than for\nother students. The teachers feel that working with children with SEND means\nadditional work. However, they think that the inclusion of children with SEND\nin mainstream educational programs is not assessed as problematic. They feel\nthat other students are also specifically addressed in the class with children\nwith SEND. However, older teachers than younger ones believe they did not\nacquire enough knowledge during their undergraduate studies.","PeriodicalId":287678,"journal":{"name":"Život i škola","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Život i škola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32903/zs.67.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The
article explores the attitudes of primary school teachers towards the inclusion
of children with special needs in mainstream educational programs in primary
schools. The theoretical part discusses the requirements of the new school
system imposed on teachers. The empirical part presents a study on the
attitudes of primary school teachers towards the inclusion of children with
special needs in mainstream primary schools and on whether there are
differences in attitudes between younger and older teachers. Descriptive and
inferential methods of empirical pedagogical research were used in this paper.
The data was collected through an online questionnaire filled out by primary
school teachers across Slovenia. The study results showed that all teachers,
regardless of age, feel that they are not sufficiently trained to work with
children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). At the same
time, they agree that they did not acquire enough skills during their
undergraduate studies to work with these children. Furthermore, the teachers
feel they do not have enough experience working with these children. At the
same time, they agree that the children with SEND should be included in
programs specifically tailored to their needs and not in mainstream primary
school programs. Additionally, the results have shown that teachers think it is
necessary to set different educational goals for children with SEND than for
other students. The teachers feel that working with children with SEND means
additional work. However, they think that the inclusion of children with SEND
in mainstream educational programs is not assessed as problematic. They feel
that other students are also specifically addressed in the class with children
with SEND. However, older teachers than younger ones believe they did not
acquire enough knowledge during their undergraduate studies.