Village Normativities and the Portuguese Imperial Order: The Case of Early Modern Goa

Â. Xavier
{"title":"Village Normativities and the Portuguese Imperial Order: The Case of Early Modern Goa","authors":"Â. Xavier","doi":"10.1163/9789004472839_003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upon visiting the villages of the ‘Old Conquests’ of Goa today—the territories that included Tiswadi, Salcete, and Bardez—it would be clear that they are very different from those of Portugal. Dominated by the Portuguese for 450 years, one could conceivably expect more similarities. Their ‘Indianness’, particularly in what concerns their religious normativity, was reconstructed during the 19th and 20th centuries. However, before the 19th century, the ‘Lusitanization’ of these villages—that is to say, the incorporation of Portuguese-style practices into village life—was more explicit in very specific dimensions, namely the administrative, legal, and religious ones. This chapter addresses some of the dimensions of this process from the perspective of the life and afterlife of a Portuguese imperial document of 1526, the Foral dos usos e costumes dos Gancares e Lavradores da Ilha de Goa e outras annexas a ella, better known as Foral de Mexia, henceforth referred to as Foral.1 Since the 16th century, Portuguese imperial administrators and, later, scholars have collected a large body of knowledge about Goan normative orders and their cultural differences in relation to the Portuguese normative orders they were familiar with (which included their African dominions). Following this, European travelers, missionaries, and merchants have also registered information about the rules that operated in different parts of Western India, particularly those relating to religion, marriage, hereditary offices, and land. The relationship between these normativities and the Portuguese imperial order, however, still needs further study. Normativities, as defined by Thomas Duve, are the sets of juridical, religious, social, and economic norms which guide individuals, groups, and peoples in","PeriodicalId":102272,"journal":{"name":"Norms beyond Empire","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norms beyond Empire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004472839_003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Upon visiting the villages of the ‘Old Conquests’ of Goa today—the territories that included Tiswadi, Salcete, and Bardez—it would be clear that they are very different from those of Portugal. Dominated by the Portuguese for 450 years, one could conceivably expect more similarities. Their ‘Indianness’, particularly in what concerns their religious normativity, was reconstructed during the 19th and 20th centuries. However, before the 19th century, the ‘Lusitanization’ of these villages—that is to say, the incorporation of Portuguese-style practices into village life—was more explicit in very specific dimensions, namely the administrative, legal, and religious ones. This chapter addresses some of the dimensions of this process from the perspective of the life and afterlife of a Portuguese imperial document of 1526, the Foral dos usos e costumes dos Gancares e Lavradores da Ilha de Goa e outras annexas a ella, better known as Foral de Mexia, henceforth referred to as Foral.1 Since the 16th century, Portuguese imperial administrators and, later, scholars have collected a large body of knowledge about Goan normative orders and their cultural differences in relation to the Portuguese normative orders they were familiar with (which included their African dominions). Following this, European travelers, missionaries, and merchants have also registered information about the rules that operated in different parts of Western India, particularly those relating to religion, marriage, hereditary offices, and land. The relationship between these normativities and the Portuguese imperial order, however, still needs further study. Normativities, as defined by Thomas Duve, are the sets of juridical, religious, social, and economic norms which guide individuals, groups, and peoples in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
村落规范与葡萄牙帝国秩序:近代早期果阿的个案
参观今天果阿“旧征服”的村庄——包括蒂斯瓦迪、萨尔塞特和巴德兹在内的领土——很明显,它们与葡萄牙的村庄非常不同。被葡萄牙人统治了450年,人们可以想象到更多的相似之处。他们的“印度性”,特别是与他们的宗教规范性有关的东西,在19世纪和20世纪被重建。然而,在19世纪之前,这些村庄的“卢西坦化”(Lusitanization)——也就是说,将葡萄牙风格的做法纳入村庄生活——在非常具体的方面更为明显,即行政、法律和宗教方面。本章从1526年葡萄牙帝国文件《Foral dos usos e costumes dos Gancares e Lavradores da Ilha de Goa e outras annexas a ella》的生活和来世的角度阐述了这一过程的一些方面,《Foral de Mexia》更被称为《Foral de Mexia》,以后简称为《fora》。1自16世纪以来,葡萄牙帝国的管理者,学者们收集了大量关于果阿规范秩序的知识,以及他们与他们熟悉的葡萄牙规范秩序(包括他们的非洲领土)的文化差异。在此之后,欧洲旅行者、传教士和商人也记录了在西印度不同地区运作的规则信息,特别是那些与宗教、婚姻、世袭办公室和土地有关的信息。然而,这些规范与葡萄牙帝国秩序之间的关系仍需要进一步研究。正如托马斯·杜夫所定义的那样,规范是指导个人、群体和人民行为的一系列法律、宗教、社会和经济规范
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catholics and Non-Christians in the Archbishopric of Goa Village Normativities and the Portuguese Imperial Order: The Case of Early Modern Goa Time as Norm: The Ritual Dimension of the Calendar Book and the Translation of Multi-Temporality in Late Imperial China The Principales of Philip II: Vassalage, Justice, and the Making of Indigenous Jurisdiction in the Early Colonial Philippines The Janus Face of Normativities in a Global Mirror: Viewing 16th-Century Marriage Practices in Japan from Christian and Japanese Traditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1