The Classical European ‘Standard of Civilization’

A. Linklater
{"title":"The Classical European ‘Standard of Civilization’","authors":"A. Linklater","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv19cwb5m.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter develops the thesis that Elias devoted too little attention to colonialism and to civilizing offensives to transform non-European peoples. To extend Elias’s explanation of the civilizing process, it considers discourses of conquest and discovery that shaped civilized self-images. Elias’s focus on the role that manners books played in influencing the dominant standards of propriety can be augmented by investigating the impact of narratives that were centred on colonial encounters. Specific attention is paid to the nineteenth century standard of civilization which was an important bridge between state formation and colonial international society. That legal doctrine embodied distinctions between civilized, semi-civilized and savage peoples that were central to the world-views of the imperial establishment. They were not fixed positions in an unchangeable hierarchy of peoples. They were linked with conceptions of human progress which assumed that societies of lesser worth could be elevated through benign imperial governance. The standard of civilization was fundamental to European attempts to create a global order in their image.","PeriodicalId":383914,"journal":{"name":"The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cwb5m.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter develops the thesis that Elias devoted too little attention to colonialism and to civilizing offensives to transform non-European peoples. To extend Elias’s explanation of the civilizing process, it considers discourses of conquest and discovery that shaped civilized self-images. Elias’s focus on the role that manners books played in influencing the dominant standards of propriety can be augmented by investigating the impact of narratives that were centred on colonial encounters. Specific attention is paid to the nineteenth century standard of civilization which was an important bridge between state formation and colonial international society. That legal doctrine embodied distinctions between civilized, semi-civilized and savage peoples that were central to the world-views of the imperial establishment. They were not fixed positions in an unchangeable hierarchy of peoples. They were linked with conceptions of human progress which assumed that societies of lesser worth could be elevated through benign imperial governance. The standard of civilization was fundamental to European attempts to create a global order in their image.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古典欧洲“文明标准”
这一章发展了伊莱亚斯对殖民主义和教化非欧洲民族的攻势关注太少的论点。为了扩展伊莱亚斯对文明过程的解释,它考虑了塑造文明自我形象的征服和发现的话语。伊莱亚斯对礼仪书籍在影响主流礼仪标准方面所起作用的关注,可以通过调查以殖民遭遇为中心的叙事的影响而得到加强。特别关注19世纪的文明标准,这是国家形成与殖民国际社会之间的重要桥梁。这种法律学说体现了文明、半文明和野蛮民族之间的区别,这是帝国建立的世界观的核心。他们在不可改变的民族等级制度中并不是固定的地位。它们与人类进步的观念有关,这种观念认为,通过良性的帝国治理,价值较低的社会可以得到提升。文明的标准是欧洲人试图按照自己的形象建立全球秩序的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Summary and Conclusions Standards of Civilization in the Post-European Global Order Back Matter The Classical European ‘Standard of Civilization’ Elias’s Explanation of the European Civilizing Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1