Elias’s Explanation of the European Civilizing Process

A. Linklater
{"title":"Elias’s Explanation of the European Civilizing Process","authors":"A. Linklater","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv19cwb5m.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explains Elias’s pioneering analysis of the European civilizing process – the process in which they came to regard themselves as uniquely civilized. It discusses his examination of how state formation, internal pacification, and rising interdependencies were linked with the development of new standards of propriety and new expectations of self-restraint. Changing attitudes to violence were integral parts of the overall direction of change. Civilized people came to regard judicial torture and capital punishment as antithetical to their refined ways of life. Changing manners were related developments. Those movements influenced European attitudes to non-European peoples. They underpinned the belief that colonialism was necessary to spread civilization. Elias did not argue that the process of civilization was evidence of human progress. The chapter discusses his analysis of decivilizing processes in Nazi Germany and the argument that sociological inquiry should seek to explain the shifting balances of power between civilizing and decivilizing processes in human\nfigurations.","PeriodicalId":383914,"journal":{"name":"The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cwb5m.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explains Elias’s pioneering analysis of the European civilizing process – the process in which they came to regard themselves as uniquely civilized. It discusses his examination of how state formation, internal pacification, and rising interdependencies were linked with the development of new standards of propriety and new expectations of self-restraint. Changing attitudes to violence were integral parts of the overall direction of change. Civilized people came to regard judicial torture and capital punishment as antithetical to their refined ways of life. Changing manners were related developments. Those movements influenced European attitudes to non-European peoples. They underpinned the belief that colonialism was necessary to spread civilization. Elias did not argue that the process of civilization was evidence of human progress. The chapter discusses his analysis of decivilizing processes in Nazi Germany and the argument that sociological inquiry should seek to explain the shifting balances of power between civilizing and decivilizing processes in human figurations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊莱亚斯对欧洲文明进程的解释
这一章解释了伊莱亚斯对欧洲文明进程的开创性分析——在这个过程中,他们开始认为自己是唯一的文明。书中讨论了他对国家形成、内部绥靖和相互依赖的增强与新礼仪标准和自我约束新期望的发展之间的关系的研究。改变对暴力的态度是变革总方向的组成部分。文明人开始将司法酷刑和死刑视为与他们优雅的生活方式相对立的。礼仪的变化是相关的发展。这些运动影响了欧洲人对非欧洲人的态度。他们坚信殖民主义对于传播文明是必要的。伊莱亚斯并不认为文明进程是人类进步的证据。这一章讨论了他对纳粹德国的去文明化过程的分析,以及社会学探究应该寻求解释在拟人化过程中文明和去文明过程之间的权力平衡转移的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Summary and Conclusions Standards of Civilization in the Post-European Global Order Back Matter The Classical European ‘Standard of Civilization’ Elias’s Explanation of the European Civilizing Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1