La loi censoriale sur les mines en Gaule cisalpine : un réexamen

M. Balbo
{"title":"La loi censoriale sur les mines en Gaule cisalpine : un réexamen","authors":"M. Balbo","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article concerns the exploitation of mines in Cisalpine Gaul undertaken by societates publicanorum after the Roman conquest (2nd c. BCE). It especially focuses on the meaning of a lex censoria about the gold mines of Victimulae (Biella), which is quoted by Pliny the Elder (NH 33.78) and which limits the number of labourers that publicans were allowed to employ in this activity. This paper reconstructs the most convincing historical context where such a rule can be placed. The comparison between Pliny and a passage from Strabo’s Geography (5.1.12) shows that the censorial law dates back to the 2nd century BCE, just after Appius Claudius Pulcher’s campaign (143-140 BCE), and before C. Marius’ rise to power. Then, it is noted that the mines of Victimulae are financially rewarding insofar their exploitation is conducted in a large-scale enterprise by publicans. The ceiling on the number of labourers was therefore meant to reduce publicans’ profits. We may contextualize this lex censoria as a chapter in the systematic dismantling (in 120-100 BCE) of the Gracchan reforms and of the fundamental principles that had inspired the policy of populares (notably of M. Fulvius Flaccus) in Cisalpine Gaul.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article concerns the exploitation of mines in Cisalpine Gaul undertaken by societates publicanorum after the Roman conquest (2nd c. BCE). It especially focuses on the meaning of a lex censoria about the gold mines of Victimulae (Biella), which is quoted by Pliny the Elder (NH 33.78) and which limits the number of labourers that publicans were allowed to employ in this activity. This paper reconstructs the most convincing historical context where such a rule can be placed. The comparison between Pliny and a passage from Strabo’s Geography (5.1.12) shows that the censorial law dates back to the 2nd century BCE, just after Appius Claudius Pulcher’s campaign (143-140 BCE), and before C. Marius’ rise to power. Then, it is noted that the mines of Victimulae are financially rewarding insofar their exploitation is conducted in a large-scale enterprise by publicans. The ceiling on the number of labourers was therefore meant to reduce publicans’ profits. We may contextualize this lex censoria as a chapter in the systematic dismantling (in 120-100 BCE) of the Gracchan reforms and of the fundamental principles that had inspired the policy of populares (notably of M. Fulvius Flaccus) in Cisalpine Gaul.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高卢西萨平矿山审查法:审查
这篇文章是关于在罗马征服(公元前2世纪)后,在阿尔卑斯山脉南部的高卢地区,由公家公社(sociates publicanorum)进行的矿山开采。它特别关注关于受害者(Biella)金矿的法律审查的意义,这是由老普林尼(NH 33.78)引用的,它限制了税吏被允许在这一活动中雇用的工人数量。本文重构了最具说服力的历史语境,在这个语境中,这样的规则可以被放置。将普林尼和斯特拉波的《地理学》(5.1.12)中的一段文字进行比较,可以看出,审查法可以追溯到公元前2世纪,就在阿皮乌斯·克劳狄乌斯·普尔彻的战役(公元前143-140)之后,在c·马吕斯掌权之前。然后,应当指出,受害者的地雷在经济上是有回报的,因为它们是在一个由公家的大规模企业中开采的。因此,劳工人数的上限意味着减少税吏的利润。我们可以把这个审查法的背景看作是格拉尚改革(公元前120-100年)和激发了阿尔卑斯山脉高卢人民政策(特别是富尔维乌斯·弗拉库斯)的基本原则的系统性瓦解的一个章节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virgile en Orient : formes et circulation de l’Énéide dans la Pars Orientis de l’Empire (Ier-VIe siècles) Paratextual readings of imperial discourse in the Res Gestae divi Augusti La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome L’appellation Caesaris (Uxor) dans les témoignages épigraphiques et littéraires sur Scribonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1